A few people have commented that JAWS 18 doesn't work well with the Find feature in Word on their computer. Here is how it was originally put: Start snippet: Using Word 2010 and Jaws 18 I can no

I do agree, they’ve got the blind sewed up with constantly coming up with new versions to profit themselves. But I tend to think with all internet browsers constantly coming up with more and more

Funny thing about the spelling of Karen! I actualy know a lady who's name is Karyn K A R Y N. She's not Australian, but she's hot none the less!

Exactly. The voices are not natural, but the speech is; the rhythm and emphasis are just better, suggesting a tighter integration with the core product. I thought they would have worked through that

I was forced to upgrade to Jaws 17 because being an idiot, I did the free upgrade to Windows 10 without looking at Freedom Scientific's website first, and it actually uninstalled my original copy of

Are you kidding! Karin and I have been an item for years now! Of course, I'm a long-time fan of Radio Australia, International, so she was a natural choice for me. You can double check my spelling,

Michael, I couldn't agree more. I mentioned on a list last evening, possibly this one, that having used eloquence for so many years it is just hard to get used to something else on the computer

Richard, The only problem with what you are doing is come the day that you have to upgrade jaws and or your operating system, and that day will come, it is going to cost you a fortune

One thing about Eloquence is that even though it doesn't sound human, the words flow together a bit more naturally at times. Vocalizer's voices sound better to me, but sometimes it sounds like sounds

I have to defend 16, especially the OCR feature. Agreed some of the alleged improvements through the years haven’t amounted to much, but this is a winner. If u use Office 2013 or later, The

I use eloquence for programming where being certain of exactly what is present is very important but a natural sounding voice for browsing where such concerns are limited. -- Soronel

I have a hard time admitting this but, I got so used to Eloquence's male voicing, of which I forget which character I have it set for, that I can't seem to do any computer work done in any efficient

I must add to this discussion that I am "still" on JAWS 13 and Windows 7. Frankly, I have seen nothing really worthwhile in any of the upgrades of either JAWS or Windows since these versions. Most

Both IBM and DEC used obnoxious child voices. I believe DEC designated its version as "Kid." I don't recall the label for the IBM Webb browser (remember that one, gang?), as I only used it a few

Bobby sounds like a cartoon character on helium. I can't stand that guy. I do prefer Vocalizer, but the new voices sound like they're in a barrel. I hope they update the voices when they update

The difference between the two is just 4 units--65 to 69. Within the male-female parameters, most can be made to sound virtually identical by adjusting the pitch. The one exception is Bobby; that

I agree. Each time we're told the new voices are the hottest thing since instant coffee, but there's always a let-down. I've never claimed eloquence sounds human, the female voices verge on awful,

Most of what mobile Facebook says to me is quote 'heading level 3' quote. Sometimes there is also text, but that annoying heading + level announcement keeps hammering along. I have 'announce

very well put. couldn't agree more.

Hi, I see "no reason" why it is not released as 17.1 instead of 18. joking, İndeed the reason is obvious, for years what FS has been doing is nothing but version proliferation, fixing what was