I think the original point to this question was in part with accessibility challenges. Sticking to that particular aspect of the thread and people who are seriously telling on themselves by doing

I didn't phrase my last post correctly, however my thought stands. What has Parlor to do with JFW? Pat Byrne

Respectfully submitted. pat Byrne

- Or, in the intended way. We're just going to have to agree to disagree. Self-expression has never, and should never, come without the possibility of consequences - whether wildly positive or

In the beginning, these platforms were supposedly like the phone company. Basically just vehicles for self expression, but now indeed they are just as much publishers as newspapers, magazines, and

 What's interesting is that conservative posts to Youtube discussing the 2020 elections have been taken down and banned, but videos about calls made by Trump to state election officials are still

 In a way, it's our fault, letting these big tech companies quietly intrude into our lives, creating a kind of addiction. How many of us actually read the terms of service agreements before we

@Brian: I have absolutely no issue with people (president or not) expressing themselves how they wish. It was mentioned before that the supreme court said it was perfectly acceptable to ban the

- Amen to that! -- Brian - Windows 10 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 20H2, Build 19042 One does not discover new lands without consenting to lose sight of the shore for a very long time. ~

Hello, The thing that really gets to me is that section 230 of the communications decency act protects these companies from things like defamation lawsuits caused by things that their users put on

- One in which the sitting President of the United States of America is a demagogue who incites riot. Too little, and way too late. -- Brian - Windows 10 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 20H2, Build 19042

The president has been banned from Twitter YouTube Facebook. What kind of world we live in win the presidential office can be banned from speaking on public forums. Randy Barnett

he wasn't rejected. he already signed a contract. the book was scheduled for release in June but after he made some comments supporting conservative views they labeled him as seditious and

- It's more than "kind of" specious. I wrote the following several years ago, when a cycle of inanity about censorship by one platform or another was going on and there were the usual stupid (and

Hi,What exact issues were you experiencing between jaws and mail onwindows 10? I love using the mail app in Windows 10! ThanksJessica On Jan 9, 2021, at 3:53 PM, E.M. Kirtley <ekirtley45@...>

It does matter though – just because corporations are “big”, it doesn’t make them so different from the “little guys” online in the 80s and 90s, who would sometimes ban people just because

Funny. Devin Nunes was carrying on about this great injustice of silencing on … a popular national conservative talk show this morning. Somehow, these decries of digital gulags and unfair muzzling

Hi, I hear you, but the problem is some groups can yell “fire” and nobody moves and other groups yell “fire” and shut down occurs. Dan

I agree with you. A dangerous slide begins when we start turning off debate. Just think how many different opinions there are about JAWS on this list. Hey, I might have to ban myself as some days I

yes the problem is the stuff that's being censored and said to be this type of speech isn't always so it's a it's just a way to censor opinions. and you and I aren't the ones to get to decide what is