Date   

moderated microsoft edge download help

Jerry hathaway
 

When I am downloading from microsoft edge I get an alert of the minutes that are left in the download. The problem the alert is announce verbally and interrupt anything I am doing on my computer. I have not been able to find any way to stop this verbal announcement. Does anybody have any suggestions on how to silent this alert. I am using windows 7 on my computer at this time and using jaws version 19. Thank you for your help.
 
Jerry
 


moderated Re: reading without ads

Jason White
 

This scenario is one use case for the JAWS Flexible Web feature. I would suggest looking up the details in the JAWS Help Topics. I don't know whether there are any tutorials or associated documentation for it.

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io <main@jfw.groups.io> On Behalf Of Mario
Sent: Sunday, 21 February 2021 13:01
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: reading without ads

in reading articles from a website using Chrome and Firefox, are there any extensions that filters out those pesky ads that may be included in the article. on occasion, I also would want to copy from the article.
please don't tell me to go look up what's available. I'm interested in asking the experts which one for each browser works well with JAWS or NVDA.


moderated Re: reading without ads

leonard morris
 

I am not sure about Chrome or Firefox. However, Microsoft Edge has a feature called emersive reader. You click the f9 key and you can either scroll down to the beginning of an article and read using the screen reader or click on the read outloud feature and a female TTS voice will read the article without the adds. You should be able to copy and paste the article if you want to do so.

On 2/22/2021 2:01 AM, Mario wrote:
in reading articles from a website using Chrome and Firefox, are there any extensions that filters out those pesky ads that may be included in the article. on occasion, I also would want to copy from the article.
please don't tell me to go look up what's available. I'm interested in asking the experts which one for each browser works well with JAWS or NVDA.



--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


moderated Re: Why does JAWS think the scripts for LibreOffice are "Symphony?"

 

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 05:35 PM, Jason White wrote:
I think the original program was StarOffice
-
It was.  I just decided to pick up at Symphony since it appeared that this was the point when the scripts originally came into being, and why they likely remain so named.

The Wikipedia page timeline shows StarOffice 1.0 through 5.2 between 1995 and somewhere between 2000 and 2001, when the fork to OpenOffice occurred.

The forking timeline that's on that page is great, if you can see it, but it would take many paragraphs of typing to try to write out what it shows graphically.
 
--

Brian - Windows 10 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 20H2, Build 19042  

One does not discover new lands without consenting to lose sight of the shore for a very long time.

           ~ André Gide


moderated Re: Why does JAWS think the scripts for LibreOffice are "Symphony?"

Jason White
 

I think the original program was StarOffice, released by Sun Microsystems as OpenOffice, and then IBM created a proprietary version called Symphony. I expect the scripts were originally written for that version.

On 19/2/21 6:37 pm, JM Casey wrote:

It’s probably a generic set of scripts named for Lotus Symphony, a discontinued suite (I think) from IBM on which Libre and Open Office *may* have based some code.

 

From: main@jfw.groups.io <main@jfw.groups.io> On Behalf Of Richard B. McDonald
Sent: February 19, 2021 04:55 PM
To: jfw@groups.io
Subject: Why does JAWS think the scripts for LibreOffice are "Symphony?"

 

Hi!

 

I am using JAWS 2020, Windows 10 and LibreOffice 7.1.  I wanted to adjust a particular setting while using LibreOffice.  Therefore I pressed JAWSKey+6.  When Settings Center opened, it thinks I am using the scripts for “Symphony.”  There is not a script set for LibreOffice, and I do not have “Symphony”; whatever that is.  Why is this?  How, or should, I go about creating a whole new settings scheme for a new application I will call “LibreOffice?"

 

Thanks,

Richard


moderated Re: reading without ads

Jim Pursley
 

Ditto. It seems to be the same reader available on Firefox, as /F9 initiates the reader there.

One little foible. The reader, at least the Immersive reader on Edge, don't always read an entire article. When the reader encounters an ad in mid article, the text stops there. the NYT has inl8ine ads in their articles. A minor thing, I think.Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io <main@jfw.groups.io> On Behalf Of John Covici
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 6:38 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: reading without ads

Using edge, if you hit f9, you get the imersive reader which so far has worked great for me.

On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 16:06:52 -0500,
JM Casey wrote:

[1 <text/plain; utf-8 (quoted-printable)>] OH, I don’t disagree with
anything you’ve said – except I guess I do feel some – not guilt maybe, but reservations. It’s not enough to stop me from using an ad blocker, but simultaneously I do feel a bit selfish for doing so sometimes. This is especially rue on youtube, where I just don’t get ads played, period. I know people who make revenue from their channels this way. I know a couple of guys who work in the newspaper industry and they say they are really caught between a rock and a hard place with this stuff – page hits just aren’t enough for these people. I don’t really know what tehh solution is, but for sure I am not going to struggle to the point of pain just to read what should be a simple webpage, and ads that play concurrently with your attempting to read an article etc do mess up screen-readers pretty badly sometimes – anything from slowing them down drastically to causing the reading position to jump around in unpredictable ways.



But, the war goes on! Yes, finding ways for ads to be far less intrusive would seem to solve a lot of everyone’s problems.







From: main@jfw.groups.io <main@jfw.groups.io> On Behalf Of Brian Vogel
Sent: February 21, 2021 03:54 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: reading without ads



On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 02:09 PM, JM Casey wrote:

the object of content providers is going to be finding cleverer and
better ways of making sure we do see the ads, moving forward.

-
And the ad-blockers keep adding new tricks to block as well.

I have never, for a single second, felt the slightest bit of guilt about ad blocking. Content providers should be paid, much like newspapers were, for having placed the ad combined with a visit count for the page. In print media, one was never guaranteed that what was circulated meant that there would be literal eyes-on for the advertising in that media. Payment was for placement and the amount determined by circulation. Now, in cyberspace, circulation can be calculated as page hits. But the fact that someone visits a page should be enough.

I have every right not to download anything to my computer that I do not wish to download. And given the intrusive nature of online advertising, that's why I block it. Since I can see, the incessant blinking, scrolling, animation, etc., etc., that goes with online advertising is the worst kind of visual clutter that distracts from my primary purpose for being anywhere. If much or most of it did not behave in that manner, I'd probably never have started using an ad blocker to begin with. Stuff that just sits quietly in it's own little box that the content flows around can be easily ignored, but that style was getting increasingly infrequent.

--

Brian - Windows 10 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 20H2, Build 19042

One does not discover new lands without consenting to lose sight of the shore for a very long time.

~ André Gide








[2 <text/html; utf-8 (quoted-printable)>]
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?

John Covici wb2una
covici@ccs.covici.com


moderated Re: reading without ads

John Covici
 

Using edge, if you hit f9, you get the imersive reader which so far
has worked great for me.

On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 16:06:52 -0500,
JM Casey wrote:

[1 <text/plain; utf-8 (quoted-printable)>]
OH, I don’t disagree with anything you’ve said – except I guess I do feel some – not guilt maybe, but reservations. It’s not enough to stop me from using an ad blocker, but simultaneously I do feel a bit selfish for doing so sometimes. This is especially rue on youtube, where I just don’t get ads played, period. I know people who make revenue from their channels this way. I know a couple of guys who work in the newspaper industry and they say they are really caught between a rock and a hard place with this stuff – page hits just aren’t enough for these people. I don’t really know what tehh solution is, but for sure I am not going to struggle to the point of pain just to read what should be a simple webpage, and ads that play concurrently with your attempting to read an article etc do mess up screen-readers pretty badly sometimes – anything from slowing them down drastically to causing the reading position to jump around in unpredictable ways.



But, the war goes on! Yes, finding ways for ads to be far less intrusive would seem to solve a lot of everyone’s problems.







From: main@jfw.groups.io <main@jfw.groups.io> On Behalf Of Brian Vogel
Sent: February 21, 2021 03:54 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: reading without ads



On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 02:09 PM, JM Casey wrote:

the object of content providers is going to be finding cleverer and better
ways of making sure we do see the ads, moving forward.

-
And the ad-blockers keep adding new tricks to block as well.

I have never, for a single second, felt the slightest bit of guilt about ad blocking. Content providers should be paid, much like newspapers were, for having placed the ad combined with a visit count for the page. In print media, one was never guaranteed that what was circulated meant that there would be literal eyes-on for the advertising in that media. Payment was for placement and the amount determined by circulation. Now, in cyberspace, circulation can be calculated as page hits. But the fact that someone visits a page should be enough.

I have every right not to download anything to my computer that I do not wish to download. And given the intrusive nature of online advertising, that's why I block it. Since I can see, the incessant blinking, scrolling, animation, etc., etc., that goes with online advertising is the worst kind of visual clutter that distracts from my primary purpose for being anywhere. If much or most of it did not behave in that manner, I'd probably never have started using an ad blocker to begin with. Stuff that just sits quietly in it's own little box that the content flows around can be easily ignored, but that style was getting increasingly infrequent.

--

Brian - Windows 10 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 20H2, Build 19042

One does not discover new lands without consenting to lose sight of the shore for a very long time.

~ André Gide








[2 <text/html; utf-8 (quoted-printable)>]
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?

John Covici wb2una
covici@ccs.covici.com


moderated Re: reading without ads

JM Casey
 

OH, I don’t disagree with anything you’ve said – except I guess I do feel some – not guilt maybe, but reservations. It’s not enough to stop me from using an ad blocker, but simultaneously I do feel a bit selfish for doing so sometimes. This is especially rue on youtube, where I just don’t get ads played, period. I know people who make revenue from their channels this way. I know a couple of guys who work in the newspaper industry and they say they are really caught between a rock and a hard place with this stuff – page hits just aren’t enough for these people. I don’t really know what tehh solution is, but for sure I am not going to struggle to the point of pain just to read what should be a simple webpage, and ads that play concurrently with your attempting to read an article etc do mess up screen-readers pretty badly sometimes – anything from slowing them down drastically to causing the reading position to jump around in unpredictable ways.

 

But, the war goes on! Yes, finding ways for ads to be far less intrusive would seem to solve a lot of everyone’s problems.

 

 

 

From: main@jfw.groups.io <main@jfw.groups.io> On Behalf Of Brian Vogel
Sent: February 21, 2021 03:54 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: reading without ads

 

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 02:09 PM, JM Casey wrote:

the object of content providers is going to be finding cleverer and better
ways of making sure we do see the ads, moving forward.

-
And the ad-blockers keep adding new tricks to block as well.

I have never, for a single second, felt the slightest bit of guilt about ad blocking.  Content providers should be paid, much like newspapers were, for having placed the ad combined with a visit count for the page.  In print media, one was never guaranteed that what was circulated meant that there would be literal eyes-on for the advertising in that media.  Payment was for placement and the amount determined by circulation.  Now, in cyberspace, circulation can be calculated as page hits.  But the fact that someone visits a page should be enough.

I have every right not to download anything to my computer that I do not wish to download.  And given the intrusive nature of online advertising, that's why I block it.  Since I can see, the incessant blinking, scrolling, animation, etc., etc., that goes with online advertising is the worst kind of visual clutter that distracts from my primary purpose for being anywhere.  If much or most of it did not behave in that manner, I'd probably never have started using an ad blocker to begin with.  Stuff that just sits quietly in it's own little box that the content flows around can be easily ignored, but that style was getting increasingly infrequent.
 
--

Brian - Windows 10 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 20H2, Build 19042  

One does not discover new lands without consenting to lose sight of the shore for a very long time.

           ~ André Gide


moderated Re: reading without ads

 

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 02:09 PM, JM Casey wrote:
the object of content providers is going to be finding cleverer and better
ways of making sure we do see the ads, moving forward.
-
And the ad-blockers keep adding new tricks to block as well.

I have never, for a single second, felt the slightest bit of guilt about ad blocking.  Content providers should be paid, much like newspapers were, for having placed the ad combined with a visit count for the page.  In print media, one was never guaranteed that what was circulated meant that there would be literal eyes-on for the advertising in that media.  Payment was for placement and the amount determined by circulation.  Now, in cyberspace, circulation can be calculated as page hits.  But the fact that someone visits a page should be enough.

I have every right not to download anything to my computer that I do not wish to download.  And given the intrusive nature of online advertising, that's why I block it.  Since I can see, the incessant blinking, scrolling, animation, etc., etc., that goes with online advertising is the worst kind of visual clutter that distracts from my primary purpose for being anywhere.  If much or most of it did not behave in that manner, I'd probably never have started using an ad blocker to begin with.  Stuff that just sits quietly in it's own little box that the content flows around can be easily ignored, but that style was getting increasingly infrequent.
 
--

Brian - Windows 10 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 20H2, Build 19042  

One does not discover new lands without consenting to lose sight of the shore for a very long time.

           ~ André Gide


moderated Re: Where can I get Silenzio?

Chris Hill
 

It was mentioned on Mosen's podcast and here is a link.

http://www.stefankiss.sk/modules.php?name=Downloads&d_op=getit&lid=112

On 2/21/2021 14:34, Kevin Minor wrote:

Hi.

 

Something happened where things got corrupted so badly on my SSD, that nothing was there, Even Windows. I did have a backup, but some things weren’t there, including Silenzio. JAWS method of trying to prevent the beginning of words being cut off doesn’t work well on this Asus Zenbook Laptop. Silenzio works much better. I’ve looked on Google, with no luck. I’d appreciate learning where to get it.

 

Thanks in advance for any help.

 

Kevin, Valerie and Jilly


moderated Re: reading without ads

 

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 03:37 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
I prefer to send my data to nobody, or google, rather than microsoft.
-
Not that not wanting to share data doesn't make sense, but in the context being discussed the data is already known.

Google is the worst among the "all knowing" software houses.  What you browse in Chrome is tracked, and analyzed to death.  Once you've loaded a page, they know you've been there.  They also know what's on that page.

I really don't know how much of something similar may or may not be going on with Edge, as I haven't kept up with it.  But by the time you're on a page they have what they want, if they want it.  An immersive reader does nothing beyond prettifying what's already on that webpage to make it easier to read.  And that doesn't matter what browser we're discussing.
--

Brian - Windows 10 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 20H2, Build 19042  

One does not discover new lands without consenting to lose sight of the shore for a very long time.

           ~ André Gide


moderated Re: Where can I get Silenzio?

Francisco Salvador Crespo
 

Hello.

Here's the link:


best.

Enviado desde mi iPhone

El 21 feb. 2021, a las 17:34, Kevin Minor <kminor65@...> escribió:



Hi.

 

Something happened where things got corrupted so badly on my SSD, that nothing was there, Even Windows. I did have a backup, but some things weren’t there, including Silenzio. JAWS method of trying to prevent the beginning of words being cut off doesn’t work well on this Asus Zenbook Laptop. Silenzio works much better. I’ve looked on Google, with no luck. I’d appreciate learning where to get it.

 

Thanks in advance for any help.

 

Kevin, Valerie and Jilly


moderated Re: reading without ads

Chris Hill
 

I have never actually tried the emersive reader in edge.  I prefer to send my data to nobody, or google, rather than microsoft.

On 2/21/2021 12:28, Mario wrote:
so for Edge, I know there's the Imersive Reader that's built in. does that not work well?

-------- Original Message --------
From: Chris Hill [mailto:hillco@earthlink.net]
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Date: Sunday, February 21, 2021, 1:17 PM
Subject: reading without ads
Well, nothing is going to get them all, because most add-ons are looking
for things that don't come from the website your reading, and some will
host ads natively.  I've been using adblockplus for years on any browser
I can.  It stops a lot of them, especially if you set it to show no
ads.  You may have to turn it off, unfortunately, to view the pages on
some websites.  I keep edge without an ad blocker, and then if I need to
read a site that won't let me I just bring it up in edge.



CH


On 2/21/2021 12:02, Mario wrote:
in reading articles from a website using Chrome and Firefox, are there
any extensions that filters out those pesky ads that may be included
in the article. on occasion, I also would want to copy from the article.
please don't tell me to go look up what's available. I'm interested in
asking the experts which one for each browser works well with JAWS or
NVDA.










.





moderated Where can I get Silenzio?

Kevin Minor
 

Hi.

 

Something happened where things got corrupted so badly on my SSD, that nothing was there, Even Windows. I did have a backup, but some things weren’t there, including Silenzio. JAWS method of trying to prevent the beginning of words being cut off doesn’t work well on this Asus Zenbook Laptop. Silenzio works much better. I’ve looked on Google, with no luck. I’d appreciate learning where to get it.

 

Thanks in advance for any help.

 

Kevin, Valerie and Jilly


moderated Re: sending posts

Mario
 

so I guess there really is no preference to email either list?

-------- Original Message --------
From: Mike B [mailto:mb69mach1@fastmail.com]
To: <main@jfw.groups.io>
Date: Sunday, February 21, 2021, 3:11 PM
Subject: sending posts
Richard,
I don't recall when or why but, this group did change it's name from,
jfw@groups.io <mailto:jfw@groups.io>
to,
main@jfw.groups.io <mailto:main@jfw.groups.io>
That's why mario was able to send the same message using both email
addresses.  Many people still use the old address and I use both
addresses when creating my message rules to keep the old address users
going to the same folder.

Stay safe and take care.  Mike.
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Richard Turner <mailto:richardturner42@outlook.com>
*To:* main@jfw.groups.io <mailto:main@jfw.groups.io>
*Sent:* Sunday, February 21, 2021 10:51 AM
*Subject:* Re: sending posts

I think they are two different groups, but I have no idea beyond that
they have different addresses.
I just send to the one that starts main@.


Richard

"You know," said Arthur, "it's at times like this, when I'm trapped in a
Vogon airlock with a man from Betelgeuse, and about to die of
asphyxiation in deep space, that I really wish I'd listened to what my
mother told me when I was young."
"Why, what did she tell you?"
"I don't know, I didn't listen."
-- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy

> On Feb 21, 2021, at 10:23 AM, Mario <mrb620@hotmail.com
<mailto:mrb620@hotmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I'm wondering. is sending an email to this list (main@jfw.groups.io
<mailto:main@jfw.groups.io>) the same as sending it to jfw@groups.io
<mailto:jfw@groups.io>?
>
> if so, what is the difference, and which one is preferred that I
email in the future?
>
>
>
>
>


moderated Re: sending posts

Richard Turner
 

Yes, I guess I thought whomever was running the JFW group was going to shut it down, and then along came the Main@ group.
That is why I only send new messages I create to the Main@ group and probably reply to the JFW@ group without paying attention that it is a different group.


Richard

"You know," said Arthur, "it's at times like this, when I'm trapped in a Vogon airlock with a man from Betelgeuse, and about to die of asphyxiation in deep space, that I really wish I'd listened to what my mother told me when I was young."
"Why, what did she tell you?"
"I don't know, I didn't listen."
-- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy

On Feb 21, 2021, at 12:11 PM, Mike B <mb69mach1@...> wrote:


Richard,
 
I don't recall when or why but, this group did change it's name from,
 
to,
 
 
That's why mario was able to send the same message using both email addresses.  Many people still use the old address and I use both addresses when creating my message rules to keep the old address users  going to the same folder.

Stay safe and take care.  Mike.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: sending posts

I think they are two different groups, but I have no idea beyond that they have different addresses.
I just send to the one that starts main@.


Richard

"You know," said Arthur, "it's at times like this, when I'm trapped in a Vogon airlock with a man from Betelgeuse, and about to die of asphyxiation in deep space, that I really wish I'd listened to what my mother told me when I was young."
"Why, what did she tell you?"
"I don't know, I didn't listen."
-- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy

> On Feb 21, 2021, at 10:23 AM, Mario <mrb620@...> wrote:
>
> I'm wondering. is sending an email to this list (main@jfw.groups.io) the same as sending it to jfw@groups.io?
>
> if so, what is the difference, and which one is preferred that I email in the future?
>
>
>
>
>






moderated Re: sending posts

Mike B
 


Richard,
 
I don't recall when or why but, this group did change it's name from,
 
to,
 
 
That's why mario was able to send the same message using both email addresses.  Many people still use the old address and I use both addresses when creating my message rules to keep the old address users  going to the same folder.

Stay safe and take care.  Mike.

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: sending posts

I think they are two different groups, but I have no idea beyond that they have different addresses.
I just send to the one that starts main@.


Richard

"You know," said Arthur, "it's at times like this, when I'm trapped in a Vogon airlock with a man from Betelgeuse, and about to die of asphyxiation in deep space, that I really wish I'd listened to what my mother told me when I was young."
"Why, what did she tell you?"
"I don't know, I didn't listen."
-- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy

> On Feb 21, 2021, at 10:23 AM, Mario <mrb620@...> wrote:
>
> I'm wondering. is sending an email to this list (main@jfw.groups.io) the same as sending it to jfw@groups.io?
>
> if so, what is the difference, and which one is preferred that I email in the future?
>
>
>
>
>






moderated Re: reading without ads

JM Casey
 

F9 always is what worked for me to enter reader view in Firefox. It still
works now.

It's necessary for people to understand the other side when it comes to ad
blockers, browser ad filtering, etc.
The creators of websites, and providers of information thereon, make most of
their money from ad revenue -- therefore even though the experience of an
adless internet life is pleasant for us (and I use uBlock Origin myself),
the object of content providers is going to be finding cleverer and better
ways of making sure we do see the ads, moving forward. So some of these
solutions may not work always and forever.

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io <main@jfw.groups.io> On Behalf Of Richard Turner
Sent: February 21, 2021 01:19 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: reading without ads

Once upon a time, control+alt+r in Firefox would put it in reader view that
tried to do that.
I've pretty much been using Edge for a couple of years, so I do not know if
that works now.

I use the Jaws marking the start of a section I want to copy, go to the end,
use the select between marked place and current location and copy.
Then, I paste into a text editor like NoteTab Pro and edit out the junk.
Set mark is control+windows+k.
At the end, insert+space, then m, then control c to copy.




Richard

Ralph's Observation: It is a mistake to allow any mechanical object<>to
realize that you are in a hurry.


My web site, www.turner42.com



-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io <main@jfw.groups.io> On Behalf Of Mario
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 10:02 AM
To: jfw@groups.io
Subject: reading without ads

in reading articles from a website using Chrome and Firefox, are there any
extensions that filters out those pesky ads that may be included in the
article. on occasion, I also would want to copy from the article.
please don't tell me to go look up what's available. I'm interested in
asking the experts which one for each browser works well with JAWS or NVDA.


moderated Re: reading without ads

 

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 01:56 PM, Mario wrote:
Brian, could you please expand on what those other tools are?
-
See the uBlock Origin extension page in the Chrome Web Store.  It appears that the uBlock Origin Extra functionality has been rolled in to uBlock Origin.
 
--

Brian - Windows 10 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 20H2, Build 19042  

One does not discover new lands without consenting to lose sight of the shore for a very long time.

           ~ André Gide


moderated Re: reading without ads

Mario
 

Brian, could you please expand on what those other tools are?

-------- Original Message --------
From: Brian Vogel [mailto:britechguy@gmail.com]
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Date: Sunday, February 21, 2021, 1:23 PM
Subject: reading without ads
uBlock Origin and uBlock Origin Extra are excellent ad blocking (among a
couple of other things) tools for Chromium-based browsers that need them.

There are also a number of browsers, e.g., Brave and Vivaldi, that have
heavy duty ad blocking and privacy measures built in to the browser.
Both of those happen to be Chromium-based, but I believe there are a
couple that are Firefox-based as well.
--

Brian -Windows 10 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 20H2, Build 19042

*One does not discover new lands without consenting to lose sight of the
shore for a very long time.*

~ André Gide

3261 - 3280 of 89982