Date   

Re: styles on MS word

Pablo Morales
 

Yes, it is exactly what I am asking.
My concern about styles, is that to be able to use them, you need to know
how they looks like.
For a sighted people watch this is easy and great. But if we need to press
Insert + F on every title, paragraph, it could be a pain in our fingers. So
I don't know how efficient or convenient is to use styles on word documents.
I don't know, let me work on this more and see if I am able to fish more
benefits.
Thank you so much for your answer,

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Marquette,
Ed
Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2016 11:24 AM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: styles on MS word


Indeed, I'm not sure what you are asking, but I'll assume that you want to
know the benefit of using styles. For simple documents, they really do not
do much, but if you create complex documents such as contracts or want to
ensure your documents look professional, styles are helpful, if not
essential.
If you are quoting a long passage and want it to be block indented one inch
from the left and right margins, you can produce that look with keystrokes,
or you could simply apply the "Block Indent" style.
If, in one contract, you want the progression to be Section 1, then Section
1.1, then (a), and then (i), you can set up your numbering styles
automatically to apply those numbers, and you can associate text font,
indent, and format characteristics for each style. The style applies until
a paragraph marker is encountered. When you apply styles that are set in
advance and known, you don't have to worry that the various paragraphs in
your document are formatted correctly. In JAWS, just press JawsKey plus f
to hear the style (or turn on automatic style enunciations).
Of course, you can create a whole array of templates with different styles,
just modifying the Heading 1, Heading 2, Heading 3, and so on styles. In
one document, Heading One might be "ARTICLE I." In another, it might be
Section 1. You can have multiple styles in one template document.
Finally, styles, I am told, are more enduring than are free form formatting
codes. I don't know whether that is true, but that was the official
Microsoft line when the legal world was converting from Word Perfect to MS
Word.



-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Pablo
Morales
Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2016 9:19 AM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: styles on MS word

Hi all,
I am not 100% sure about the styles on MS Word. Let me explain to you what I
am trying to ask.
We are able to create paragraph formats on text with some keystrokes, we are
able to create headings level 1,2,3, and so on. All of these with some
keystrokes.
What is the real benefit of the use of styles already design over these
keystrokes?
Thank you so much,






----------------------------------------------------------------------
This E-mail message is confidential, is intended only for the named
recipients above and may contain information that is privileged, attorney
work product or otherwise protected by applicable law. If you have received
this message in error, please notify the sender at 402-346-6000 and delete
this E-mail message.
Thank you.


Re: styles on MS word

Marquette, Ed <ed.marquette@...>
 

Indeed, I'm not sure what you are asking, but I'll assume that you want to know the benefit of using styles. For simple documents, they really do not do much, but if you create complex documents such as contracts or want to ensure your documents look professional, styles are helpful, if not essential.
If you are quoting a long passage and want it to be block indented one inch from the left and right margins, you can produce that look with keystrokes, or you could simply apply the "Block Indent" style.
If, in one contract, you want the progression to be Section 1, then Section 1.1, then (a), and then (i), you can set up your numbering styles automatically to apply those numbers, and you can associate text font, indent, and format characteristics for each style. The style applies until a paragraph marker is encountered. When you apply styles that are set in advance and known, you don't have to worry that the various paragraphs in your document are formatted correctly. In JAWS, just press JawsKey plus f to hear the style (or turn on automatic style enunciations).
Of course, you can create a whole array of templates with different styles, just modifying the Heading 1, Heading 2, Heading 3, and so on styles. In one document, Heading One might be "ARTICLE I." In another, it might be Section 1. You can have multiple styles in one template document.
Finally, styles, I am told, are more enduring than are free form formatting codes. I don't know whether that is true, but that was the official Microsoft line when the legal world was converting from Word Perfect to MS Word.

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Pablo Morales
Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2016 9:19 AM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: styles on MS word

Hi all,
I am not 100% sure about the styles on MS Word. Let me explain to you what I am trying to ask.
We are able to create paragraph formats on text with some keystrokes, we are able to create headings level 1,2,3, and so on. All of these with some keystrokes.
What is the real benefit of the use of styles already design over these keystrokes?
Thank you so much,






----------------------------------------------------------------------
This E-mail message is confidential, is intended only for the named recipients above and may contain information
that is privileged, attorney work product or otherwise protected by applicable law. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender at 402-346-6000 and delete this E-mail message.
Thank you.


styles on MS word

Pablo Morales
 

Hi all,
I am not 100% sure about the styles on MS Word. Let me explain to you what I
am trying to ask.
We are able to create paragraph formats on text with some keystrokes, we are
able to create headings level 1,2,3, and so on. All of these with some
keystrokes.
What is the real benefit of the use of styles already design over these
keystrokes?
Thank you so much,


Re: Virtual Ribbon Menu - On or Off by Default?

 

Thanks to all for the info.  I had been hoping that "OFF" was the default, and thought that it was, but wanted to confirm.

I really prefer to teach people how to actually use the ribbon interface in its native form.  It's here to stay and, once you get used to it, not all that much different than menus.  The keyboard shortcuts that are native to a number of Windows programs get obliterated if Virtual Ribbon Menu is on, and I've found that to be distinctly not helpful.
--
Brian


A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices.

         ~ William James


Re: Virtual Ribbon Menu - On or Off by Default?

Bill White <billwhite92701@...>
 


Hi, Brian. When you open the JAWS Settings Center, and navigate to Miscellaneous, this is where you will find the "Use Virtual Ribbons check box. It can only be set in the default configuration file. This is accomplished with the keystroke:
CONTROL plus SHIFT plus D.
 
Once you find the "Use Virtual Ribbons check box, if you tab once, you will find a dialog box which explains the function of this check box. Here is what it says:
 
Select this check box to turn on the Virtual Ribbon Menu. When it is on, the Ribbon is organized and navigated using a traditional menu and submenu format. This is true for any application that uses Ribbon menus. This makes it easy to navigate using ARROW keys or first letter navigation. This option is only available when Default settings are selected in the Application combo box. It is unavailable for other application specific files that are loaded. This check box is cleared by default.
 
Notice the last line of the explanation:
 
This check box is cleared by default.
 
This is an easy way to find the default setting for many of these settings dialogs.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 8:43 PM
Subject: Virtual Ribbon Menu - On or Off by Default?

Hello All,

         I can't recall whether the Virtual Ribbon Menu feature is set on by default or not.  If someone knows off the top of their head please share.
--
Brian


A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices.

         ~ William James



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 14543 (20161202) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


Re: Virtual Ribbon Menu - On or Off by Default?

Mike B. <mwb5781@...>
 


Hi Brian
 
The default setting is, Off.,
Take care.
Mike
Sent from my iBarstool.

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: Virtual Ribbon Menu - On or Off by Default?

It is usually off by default.
 
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 11:43 PM
Subject: Virtual Ribbon Menu - On or Off by Default?
 

Hello All,

         I can't recall whether the Virtual Ribbon Menu feature is set on by default or not.  If someone knows off the top of their head please share.
--
Brian


A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices.

         ~ William James


Re: Virtual Ribbon Menu - On or Off by Default?

Melissa Stott <mstott69@...>
 

It is usually off by default.
 

Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 11:43 PM
Subject: Virtual Ribbon Menu - On or Off by Default?
 

Hello All,

         I can't recall whether the Virtual Ribbon Menu feature is set on by default or not.  If someone knows off the top of their head please share.
--
Brian


A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices.

         ~ William James


Virtual Ribbon Menu - On or Off by Default?

 

Hello All,

         I can't recall whether the Virtual Ribbon Menu feature is set on by default or not.  If someone knows off the top of their head please share.
--
Brian


A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices.

         ~ William James


Re: replying directly to sender

Dave...
 

Mike,

The subject matter of this thread is the "reply direct to sender, so my
answer was germane to that subject.

Dave
Oregonian, woodworker, Engineer, Musician, and Pioneer

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Ulrich" <mulrich@centurylink.net>
To: <main@jfw.groups.io>
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 09:10
Subject: Re: replying directly to sender


I thought when hitting Control Shift R; it would indeed reply to all,
including the CC addressees? I seem to remember that being the case when I
replied to all; including those CC recipients.
I'm just not too sure about the BCC addressees?

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Dave
Carlson
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 12:01 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: replying directly to sender

Your assumption is incorrect. It only applies to the TO: field.

Dave
Oregonian, woodworker, Engineer, Musician, and Pioneer


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mario" <mrb620@hotmail.com>
To: <main@jfw.groups.io>
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 08:01
Subject: Re: replying directly to sender


Mike, I'm assuming the control+shift+r replies to the email addresses in
the cc field as well as the from field, but does the function also
include any bcc addresses?


-------- Original Message --------
From: Mike Ulrich [mailto:mulrich@centurylink.net]
Sent: Friday, Dec 2, 2016 5:59 AM EST
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: replying directly to sender

What about the standard; Control R?

Then if you wanna reply to all; Control Shift R.



*From:*main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] *On Behalf Of
*Melissa Stott
*Sent:* Friday, December 02, 2016 5:48 AM
*To:* main@jfw.groups.io
*Subject:* Re: replying directly to sender



That hasn’t worked for me for a long while.



*From:*Kimsan <mailto:kimsansong@outlook.com>

*Sent:*Friday, December 02, 2016 1:41 AM

*To:*main@jfw.groups.io <mailto:main@jfw.groups.io>

*Subject:*replying directly to sender



Hi,



I’m not sure if it’s by luck, or outlook 2016, or the jaws version I’m
using which is 17. Heck, I just don’t know. In any event, those using
outlook 2016, since that’s the version I’m using, could someone (and you
can use my email here to test it if you’d like) evoke the keystroke
insert shift r to see if the reply directly to sender works for them?

I don’t think this mailing list replies directly to the member when
replying like other lists but I do remember the above keystroke not
working in the past, and again, I’m not sure if it’s jaws 17, or outlook
2016. If it is outlook 2016, awesome as smile that keystroke never
worked for me in previous versions which got me in trouble quite a bit.

I bring this up as I was talking to a buddy about this and how I can
reply directly to a sender without opening up notepad, coppying, pasting
etc. I just went to five different emails on different mailing lists and
insert shift r indeed replied directly to sender, which rocks.



Respectfully,



Kimsan Song


Re: creating shortcuts for windows10 apps, example, windows 10 mail app.

Melissa Stott <mstott69@...>
 

Thanks for this info.  I will soon have a new computer with Windows10, so I am preparing myself.
 

From: david
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 2:40 PM
Subject: creating shortcuts for windows10 apps, example, windows 10 mail app.
 

 

As you become more familiar with Windows 10, you will likely appreciate how easy it is to access the universal apps and desktop applications you use every

day … assuming you do so from either Start or the taskbar. But one thing Windows 10 doesn’t provide is a way to create a shortcut to these apps so you

can launch them from the desktop or elsewhere.

 

Or, at least an obvious way.

 

But as it turns out, all of the applications installed on your PC, including the universal apps that come with Windows 10 or are downloaded from Windows

Store are accessible from a hidden shell view called Applications.  Once you open this view in File Explorer, you can create shortcuts for any of them. Open the Run dialog (Windows+R=run), type in:

shell:AppsFolder

 

and then press enter  to view this folder.

 

apps-folder

 

Find an app you wish to create a shortcut for, right-click  (applications key, or, shift+f10 and choose Create shortcut from the pop-up menu that appears.

 

create-shortcut

 

You’ll be prompted that the shortcut cannot be placed here, and Windows will recommend placing it on the desktop instead. Press enter on  Yes. A shortcut with the name App-Name  Shortcut (Mail Shortcut) will appear on the desktop. You can leave this as-is, or rename it (I usually remove the word, Shortcut). And you can of course move the shortcut to any folder as needed.

 

Now, just repeat for all the app shortcuts you need.


Re: Does anybody know the correct e-mail address to freedom scientific? Addison

O.Addison Gethers
 

Thanks for those who's answer back to me. But I find out the correct e-mail address for freedom support technical support is Support@VFO-Group.com
Addison

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Soronel Haetir
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 5:06 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Does anybody know the correct e-mail address to freedom scientific? Addison

The FS web site is still up and the www.vfo-group.com Brands page links to it. I would certainly expect that until those conditions change that support@freedomscientific.com should remain valid.
Perhaps they are simply having a problem right now (I have sent a message to that address within the last week).

On 12/2/16, Jeanette McAllister PhD
<Jeanette@mcallisterenterprisesusa.com> wrote:
Try vfo-group.com

Dr. Jeanette McAllister
757-346-0708

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 2, 2016, at 4:51 PM, O.Addison Gethers
<o.addisongethers@gmail.com>
wrote:

Thank you but I try that and got delivery failed !!


-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of
Soronel Haetir
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 3:42 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Does anybody know the correct e-mail address to freedom
scientific? Addison

Hi,

FS tech support address is: support@freedomscientific.com

On 12/2/16, O.Addison Gethers <o.addisongethers@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello All,

Does anybody know the correct e-mail address to contact freedom
scientific ?

Addison




--
Soronel Haetir
soronel.haetir@gmail.com









--
Soronel Haetir
soronel.haetir@gmail.com


Re: Does anybody know the correct e-mail address to freedom scientific? Addison

Soronel Haetir
 

The FS web site is still up and the www.vfo-group.com Brands page
links to it. I would certainly expect that until those conditions
change that support@freedomscientific.com should remain valid.
Perhaps they are simply having a problem right now (I have sent a
message to that address within the last week).

On 12/2/16, Jeanette McAllister PhD
<Jeanette@mcallisterenterprisesusa.com> wrote:
Try vfo-group.com

Dr. Jeanette McAllister
757-346-0708

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 2, 2016, at 4:51 PM, O.Addison Gethers <o.addisongethers@gmail.com>
wrote:

Thank you but I try that and got delivery failed !!


-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Soronel
Haetir
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 3:42 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Does anybody know the correct e-mail address to freedom
scientific? Addison

Hi,

FS tech support address is: support@freedomscientific.com

On 12/2/16, O.Addison Gethers <o.addisongethers@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello All,

Does anybody know the correct e-mail address to contact freedom
scientific
?

Addison




--
Soronel Haetir
soronel.haetir@gmail.com









--
Soronel Haetir
soronel.haetir@gmail.com


Re: Does anybody know the correct e-mail address to freedom scientific? Addison

Jeanette McAllister PhD
 

Try vfo-group.com

Dr. Jeanette McAllister
757-346-0708

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 2, 2016, at 4:51 PM, O.Addison Gethers <o.addisongethers@gmail.com> wrote:

Thank you but I try that and got delivery failed !!


-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Soronel Haetir
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 3:42 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Does anybody know the correct e-mail address to freedom scientific? Addison

Hi,

FS tech support address is: support@freedomscientific.com

On 12/2/16, O.Addison Gethers <o.addisongethers@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello All,

Does anybody know the correct e-mail address to contact freedom scientific
?

Addison




--
Soronel Haetir
soronel.haetir@gmail.com







Re: Does anybody know the correct e-mail address to freedom scientific? Addison

O.Addison Gethers
 

Thank you but I try that and got delivery failed !!

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Soronel Haetir
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 3:42 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Does anybody know the correct e-mail address to freedom scientific? Addison

Hi,

FS tech support address is: support@freedomscientific.com

On 12/2/16, O.Addison Gethers <o.addisongethers@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello All,

Does anybody know the correct e-mail address to contact freedom scientific
?

Addison




--
Soronel Haetir
soronel.haetir@gmail.com


Re: Does anybody know the correct e-mail address to freedom scientific? Addison

Soronel Haetir
 

Hi,

FS tech support address is: support@freedomscientific.com

On 12/2/16, O.Addison Gethers <o.addisongethers@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello All,

Does anybody know the correct e-mail address to contact freedom scientific
?

Addison



--
Soronel Haetir
soronel.haetir@gmail.com


Does anybody know the correct e-mail address to freedom scientific? Addison

O.Addison Gethers
 

Hello All,

Does anybody know the correct e-mail address to contact freedom scientific ?

Addison




creating shortcuts for windows10 apps, example, windows 10 mail app.

david
 

 

As you become more familiar with Windows 10, you will likely appreciate how easy it is to access the universal apps and desktop applications you use every

day … assuming you do so from either Start or the taskbar. But one thing Windows 10 doesn’t provide is a way to create a shortcut to these apps so you

can launch them from the desktop or elsewhere.

 

Or, at least an obvious way.

 

But as it turns out, all of the applications installed on your PC, including the universal apps that come with Windows 10 or are downloaded from Windows

Store are accessible from a hidden shell view called Applications.  Once you open this view in File Explorer, you can create shortcuts for any of them. Open the Run dialog (Windows+R=run), type in:

shell:AppsFolder

 

and then press enter  to view this folder.

 

apps-folder

 

Find an app you wish to create a shortcut for, right-click  (applications key, or, shift+f10 and choose Create shortcut from the pop-up menu that appears.

 

create-shortcut

 

You’ll be prompted that the shortcut cannot be placed here, and Windows will recommend placing it on the desktop instead. Press enter on  Yes. A shortcut with the name App-Name  Shortcut (Mail Shortcut) will appear on the desktop. You can leave this as-is, or rename it (I usually remove the word, Shortcut). And you can of course move the shortcut to any folder as needed.

 

Now, just repeat for all the app shortcuts you need.


googlegroups

Kimsan <kimsansong@...>
 

Hi,

Does anyone have any tricks or tips on how to navigate google groups?

 

I'm in a mailing list that uses google groups to handle your subscription, and the last time I logged in there earlier this week, I was lost.

Thanks.

 

Respectfully,

 

Kimsan Song

 


Re: replying directly to sender

 

Maybe, but I have yet to be on a list that was set up this way. Granted, I don’t have time to subscribe to a lot of lists, but I’m on Viphone, this Jaws list and the blind woodworkers list and on none of them will Control+R reply to the actual sender of a message. Anyhow, now I know of this Jaws Key+Shift+R which is even easier than using the Leasey keystroke to copy the sender’s address to the clipboard so it can be pasted.

 

Regards,

Sieghard

 

From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Mike Ulrich
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 10:08 AM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: replying directly to sender

 

Although some list serves, if set up this way, the control shift R will indeed, reply to all. Plus when you hit control R; it will only reply to the sender and not the whole list.

The Florida Council of the Blind’s fcb-l list serve is set up just like this.

 

From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Sieghard Weitzel
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 12:53 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: replying directly to sender

 

If the message comes from a mailing list Control+R simply replies back to the list, not the actual person who sent the message.

 

 

From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Mike Ulrich
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 2:59 AM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: replying directly to sender

 

What about the standard; Control R?

Then if you wanna reply to all; Control Shift R.

 

From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Melissa Stott
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 5:48 AM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: replying directly to sender

 

That hasn’t worked for me for a long while.

 

From: Kimsan

Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 1:41 AM

Subject: replying directly to sender

 

Hi,

 

I’m not sure if it’s by luck, or outlook 2016, or the jaws version I’m using which is 17.  Heck, I just don’t know.  In any event, those using outlook 2016, since that’s the version I’m using, could someone (and you can use my email here to test it if you’d like) evoke the keystroke insert shift r to see if the reply directly to sender works for them?

I don’t think this mailing list replies directly to the member when replying like other lists but I do remember the above keystroke not working in the past, and again, I’m not sure if it’s jaws 17, or outlook 2016.  If it is outlook 2016, awesome as smile that keystroke never worked for me in previous versions which got me in trouble quite a bit.

I bring this up as I was talking to a buddy about this and how I can reply directly to a sender without opening up notepad, coppying, pasting etc. I just went to five different emails on different mailing lists and insert shift r indeed replied directly to sender, which rocks.

 

Respectfully,

 

Kimsan Song

 

 

 


Re: replying directly to sender

Kimsan <kimsansong@...>
 

It does...

Respectfully,

Kimsan Song

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Sieghard Weitzel
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 9:55 AM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: replying directly to sender

I am quite sure Shift+Control+R will include addresses in the CC field.


-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Mike Ulrich
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 9:11 AM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: replying directly to sender

I thought when hitting Control Shift R; it would indeed reply to all, including the CC addressees? I seem to remember that being the case when I replied to all; including those CC recipients.
I'm just not too sure about the BCC addressees?

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Dave Carlson
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 12:01 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: replying directly to sender

Your assumption is incorrect. It only applies to the TO: field.

Dave
Oregonian, woodworker, Engineer, Musician, and Pioneer


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mario" <mrb620@hotmail.com>
To: <main@jfw.groups.io>
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 08:01
Subject: Re: replying directly to sender


Mike, I'm assuming the control+shift+r replies to the email addresses in
the cc field as well as the from field, but does the function also
include any bcc addresses?


-------- Original Message --------
From: Mike Ulrich [mailto:mulrich@centurylink.net]
Sent: Friday, Dec 2, 2016 5:59 AM EST
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: replying directly to sender

What about the standard; Control R?

Then if you wanna reply to all; Control Shift R.



*From:*main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] *On Behalf Of
*Melissa Stott
*Sent:* Friday, December 02, 2016 5:48 AM
*To:* main@jfw.groups.io
*Subject:* Re: replying directly to sender



That hasn’t worked for me for a long while.



*From:*Kimsan <mailto:kimsansong@outlook.com>

*Sent:*Friday, December 02, 2016 1:41 AM

*To:*main@jfw.groups.io <mailto:main@jfw.groups.io>

*Subject:*replying directly to sender



Hi,



I’m not sure if it’s by luck, or outlook 2016, or the jaws version I’m
using which is 17. Heck, I just don’t know. In any event, those using
outlook 2016, since that’s the version I’m using, could someone (and you
can use my email here to test it if you’d like) evoke the keystroke
insert shift r to see if the reply directly to sender works for them?

I don’t think this mailing list replies directly to the member when
replying like other lists but I do remember the above keystroke not
working in the past, and again, I’m not sure if it’s jaws 17, or outlook
2016. If it is outlook 2016, awesome as smile that keystroke never
worked for me in previous versions which got me in trouble quite a bit.

I bring this up as I was talking to a buddy about this and how I can
reply directly to a sender without opening up notepad, coppying, pasting
etc. I just went to five different emails on different mailing lists and
insert shift r indeed replied directly to sender, which rocks.



Respectfully,



Kimsan Song