Date   

Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

 

The only way I know to do it is the long way. Hit jaws key + j to get
to Jaws menu. You'll be on the options submenu so you want to press
the right arrow, then v to get to voices. Hit down arrow once to go
to voice adjustment, then hit enter and then tab through the dialog
box. I don't know of any shortcuts to get there without scrolling
through the menus.

On 10/31/16, Carolyn Arnold <4carolyna@windstream.net> wrote:
I tried that and got to the same place I have gotten in
other places. I am trying to get to the choices of like Reid
and Samantha, thanks.

Bye for now,

Carolyn

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Alan Robbins
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 8:12 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

Carolyn

Ctrl + jaws key + s

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Carolyn Arnold
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 7:36 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

Maria, which command to you give to get to the voice
choices? I've done it in the past, but can't remember where
it is and not getting there tonight, thanks.

Bye for now,

Carolyn

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Maria Campbell
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 7:18 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

Eloquence rocks! There's nothing better.


Maria Campbell
lucky1@gmail.com

Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries.
Without them, humanity cannot survive.
--Dalai Lama

On 10/31/2016 7:16 PM, Carolyn Arnold wrote:
I vote for Eloquence.

Bye for now,

Carolyn


-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Alan
Robbins
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:55 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

Dennis,

As nice as the new voices are, each time new ones appear I
give a
listen but after using eloquence for so many years, hard
to give it up

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of
dennis
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:18 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

they still seam to pronounce things the same and sound
pritty much the same to me. this is why i use elliquence. i
have shelly sounding as human as possible.


On 10/31/2016 4:55 PM, Soronel Haetir wrote:
I still prefer RSD Emily, but that has significant
problems under
jaws 18, particularly involving left quote (U+201c),
right quote
(U+201d) and apostrophe (U+2019 IIRC) characters.

On 10/31/16, Kramlinger, Keith G., M.D.
<kramlinger.keith@mayo.edu> wrote:
Hi,

I know there's a lot of subjectivity in voice
preferences, but I'm
curious if any can describe general aspects of how the
new Vocalizer
voices are different from the ones previously available.

Thanks in advance, Keith


























Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

Carolyn Arnold <4carolyna@...>
 

I tried that and got to the same place I have gotten in
other places. I am trying to get to the choices of like Reid
and Samantha, thanks.

Bye for now,

Carolyn

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Alan Robbins
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 8:12 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

Carolyn

Ctrl + jaws key + s

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Carolyn Arnold
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 7:36 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

Maria, which command to you give to get to the voice
choices? I've done it in the past, but can't remember where
it is and not getting there tonight, thanks.

Bye for now,

Carolyn

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Maria Campbell
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 7:18 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

Eloquence rocks! There's nothing better.


Maria Campbell
lucky1@gmail.com

Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries.
Without them, humanity cannot survive.
--Dalai Lama

On 10/31/2016 7:16 PM, Carolyn Arnold wrote:
I vote for Eloquence.

Bye for now,

Carolyn


-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Alan
Robbins
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:55 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

Dennis,

As nice as the new voices are, each time new ones appear I
give a
listen but after using eloquence for so many years, hard
to give it up

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of
dennis
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:18 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

they still seam to pronounce things the same and sound
pritty much the same to me. this is why i use elliquence. i
have shelly sounding as human as possible.


On 10/31/2016 4:55 PM, Soronel Haetir wrote:
I still prefer RSD Emily, but that has significant
problems under
jaws 18, particularly involving left quote (U+201c),
right quote
(U+201d) and apostrophe (U+2019 IIRC) characters.

On 10/31/16, Kramlinger, Keith G., M.D.
<kramlinger.keith@mayo.edu> wrote:
Hi,

I know there's a lot of subjectivity in voice
preferences, but I'm
curious if any can describe general aspects of how the
new Vocalizer
voices are different from the ones previously available.

Thanks in advance, Keith











Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

Carolyn Arnold <4carolyna@...>
 

Thanks , All, going there now.

Bye for now,

Carolyn

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Alan Robbins
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 8:12 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

Carolyn

Ctrl + jaws key + s

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Carolyn Arnold
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 7:36 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

Maria, which command to you give to get to the voice
choices? I've done it in the past, but can't remember where
it is and not getting there tonight, thanks.

Bye for now,

Carolyn

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Maria Campbell
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 7:18 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

Eloquence rocks! There's nothing better.


Maria Campbell
lucky1@gmail.com

Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries.
Without them, humanity cannot survive.
--Dalai Lama

On 10/31/2016 7:16 PM, Carolyn Arnold wrote:
I vote for Eloquence.

Bye for now,

Carolyn


-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Alan
Robbins
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:55 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

Dennis,

As nice as the new voices are, each time new ones appear I
give a
listen but after using eloquence for so many years, hard
to give it up

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of
dennis
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:18 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

they still seam to pronounce things the same and sound
pritty much the same to me. this is why i use elliquence. i
have shelly sounding as human as possible.


On 10/31/2016 4:55 PM, Soronel Haetir wrote:
I still prefer RSD Emily, but that has significant
problems under
jaws 18, particularly involving left quote (U+201c),
right quote
(U+201d) and apostrophe (U+2019 IIRC) characters.

On 10/31/16, Kramlinger, Keith G., M.D.
<kramlinger.keith@mayo.edu> wrote:
Hi,

I know there's a lot of subjectivity in voice
preferences, but I'm
curious if any can describe general aspects of how the
new Vocalizer
voices are different from the ones previously available.

Thanks in advance, Keith











Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

Alan Robbins <alan1057@...>
 

Carolyn

Ctrl + jaws key + s

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Carolyn Arnold
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 7:36 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

Maria, which command to you give to get to the voice
choices? I've done it in the past, but can't remember where
it is and not getting there tonight, thanks.

Bye for now,

Carolyn

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Maria Campbell
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 7:18 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

Eloquence rocks! There's nothing better.


Maria Campbell
lucky1@gmail.com

Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries.
Without them, humanity cannot survive.
--Dalai Lama

On 10/31/2016 7:16 PM, Carolyn Arnold wrote:
I vote for Eloquence.

Bye for now,

Carolyn


-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Alan
Robbins
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:55 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

Dennis,

As nice as the new voices are, each time new ones appear I
give a
listen but after using eloquence for so many years, hard
to give it up

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of
dennis
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:18 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

they still seam to pronounce things the same and sound
pritty much the same to me. this is why i use elliquence. i
have shelly sounding as human as possible.


On 10/31/2016 4:55 PM, Soronel Haetir wrote:
I still prefer RSD Emily, but that has significant
problems under
jaws 18, particularly involving left quote (U+201c),
right quote
(U+201d) and apostrophe (U+2019 IIRC) characters.

On 10/31/16, Kramlinger, Keith G., M.D.
<kramlinger.keith@mayo.edu> wrote:
Hi,

I know there's a lot of subjectivity in voice
preferences, but I'm
curious if any can describe general aspects of how the
new Vocalizer
voices are different from the ones previously available.

Thanks in advance, Keith











Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

Alan Robbins <alan1057@...>
 

Marie,

Yes, agreed. That is the voice on my iPhone as well so am
pretty used to it. Zoe not too bad either.

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Maria Campbell
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 7:06 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

Agree wholeheartedly, but Samantha is pretty good--quite
responsive and nice and clear despite my hearing loss.


Maria Campbell
lucky1@gmail.com

Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries.
Without them, humanity cannot survive.
--Dalai Lama

On 10/31/2016 6:54 PM, Alan Robbins wrote:
Dennis,

As nice as the new voices are, each time new ones appear I
give a listen but after using eloquence for so many years,
hard to give it up

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of dennis
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:18 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

they still seam to pronounce things the same and sound
pritty much the
same to me. this is why i use elliquence. i have shelly
sounding as
human as possible.


On 10/31/2016 4:55 PM, Soronel Haetir wrote:
I still prefer RSD Emily, but that has significant
problems under jaws
18, particularly involving left quote (U+201c), right
quote (U+201d)
and apostrophe (U+2019 IIRC) characters.

On 10/31/16, Kramlinger, Keith G., M.D.
<kramlinger.keith@mayo.edu> wrote:
Hi,

I know there's a lot of subjectivity in voice
preferences, but I'm curious
if any can describe general aspects of how the new
Vocalizer voices are
different from the ones previously available.

Thanks in advance, Keith







Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

Carolyn Arnold <4carolyna@...>
 

Maria, which command to you give to get to the voice
choices? I've done it in the past, but can't remember where
it is and not getting there tonight, thanks.

Bye for now,

Carolyn

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Maria Campbell
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 7:18 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

Eloquence rocks! There's nothing better.


Maria Campbell
lucky1@gmail.com

Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries.
Without them, humanity cannot survive.
--Dalai Lama

On 10/31/2016 7:16 PM, Carolyn Arnold wrote:
I vote for Eloquence.

Bye for now,

Carolyn


-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Alan
Robbins
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:55 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

Dennis,

As nice as the new voices are, each time new ones appear I
give a
listen but after using eloquence for so many years, hard
to give it up

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of
dennis
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:18 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer
voices

they still seam to pronounce things the same and sound
pritty much the same to me. this is why i use elliquence. i
have shelly sounding as human as possible.


On 10/31/2016 4:55 PM, Soronel Haetir wrote:
I still prefer RSD Emily, but that has significant
problems under
jaws 18, particularly involving left quote (U+201c),
right quote
(U+201d) and apostrophe (U+2019 IIRC) characters.

On 10/31/16, Kramlinger, Keith G., M.D.
<kramlinger.keith@mayo.edu> wrote:
Hi,

I know there's a lot of subjectivity in voice
preferences, but I'm
curious if any can describe general aspects of how the
new Vocalizer
voices are different from the ones previously available.

Thanks in advance, Keith











Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

Maria Campbell
 

Eloquence rocks! There's nothing better.


Maria Campbell
lucky1@gmail.com

Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries.
Without them, humanity cannot survive.
--Dalai Lama

On 10/31/2016 7:16 PM, Carolyn Arnold wrote:
I vote for Eloquence.

Bye for now,

Carolyn


-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Alan Robbins
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:55 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

Dennis,

As nice as the new voices are, each time new ones appear I give a listen but after using eloquence for so many years, hard to give it up

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of dennis
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:18 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

they still seam to pronounce things the same and sound pritty much the same to me. this is why i use elliquence. i have shelly sounding as human as possible.


On 10/31/2016 4:55 PM, Soronel Haetir wrote:
I still prefer RSD Emily, but that has significant problems under jaws
18, particularly involving left quote (U+201c), right quote (U+201d)
and apostrophe (U+2019 IIRC) characters.

On 10/31/16, Kramlinger, Keith G., M.D. <kramlinger.keith@mayo.edu> wrote:
Hi,

I know there's a lot of subjectivity in voice preferences, but I'm
curious if any can describe general aspects of how the new Vocalizer
voices are different from the ones previously available.

Thanks in advance, Keith










Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

Carolyn Arnold <4carolyna@...>
 

I vote for Eloquence.

Bye for now,

Carolyn

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Alan Robbins
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:55 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

Dennis,

As nice as the new voices are, each time new ones appear I give a listen but after using eloquence for so many years, hard to give it up

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of dennis
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:18 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

they still seam to pronounce things the same and sound pritty much the same to me. this is why i use elliquence. i have shelly sounding as human as possible.


On 10/31/2016 4:55 PM, Soronel Haetir wrote:
I still prefer RSD Emily, but that has significant problems under jaws
18, particularly involving left quote (U+201c), right quote (U+201d)
and apostrophe (U+2019 IIRC) characters.

On 10/31/16, Kramlinger, Keith G., M.D. <kramlinger.keith@mayo.edu> wrote:
Hi,

I know there's a lot of subjectivity in voice preferences, but I'm
curious if any can describe general aspects of how the new Vocalizer
voices are different from the ones previously available.

Thanks in advance, Keith


Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

Jason White
 

Maria Campbell <lucky1inct@gmail.com> wrote:
Agree wholeheartedly, but Samantha is pretty good--quite responsive and nice
and clear despite my hearing loss.

I find that the new Vocalizer Expressive 2.2 voices respond more quickly when
interrupted, and the speech quality is slightly better than that of the old
versions.


Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

Maria Campbell
 

Agree wholeheartedly, but Samantha is pretty good--quite responsive and nice and clear despite my hearing loss.


Maria Campbell
lucky1@gmail.com

Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries.
Without them, humanity cannot survive.
--Dalai Lama

On 10/31/2016 6:54 PM, Alan Robbins wrote:
Dennis,

As nice as the new voices are, each time new ones appear I give a listen but after using eloquence for so many years, hard to give it up

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of dennis
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:18 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

they still seam to pronounce things the same and sound pritty much the
same to me. this is why i use elliquence. i have shelly sounding as
human as possible.


On 10/31/2016 4:55 PM, Soronel Haetir wrote:
I still prefer RSD Emily, but that has significant problems under jaws
18, particularly involving left quote (U+201c), right quote (U+201d)
and apostrophe (U+2019 IIRC) characters.

On 10/31/16, Kramlinger, Keith G., M.D. <kramlinger.keith@mayo.edu> wrote:
Hi,

I know there's a lot of subjectivity in voice preferences, but I'm curious
if any can describe general aspects of how the new Vocalizer voices are
different from the ones previously available.

Thanks in advance, Keith






Re: I am not a robot check boxes on websites

paul lemm
 

Hi Brian,

 

Thanks for letting me know, I thought maybe I’d missed something about  Edge now working with Jaws so just thought I’d double check, I’m quite happy still working with IE, but was just intrigued about edge and  what it had to offer and how it compared with IE, well looks like I’ll have to wait a little longer  to see, although I’m surprised to hear its working with the other screen readers and not jaws though.

 

 

Paul

 

From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Brian Vogel
Sent: 31 October 2016 22:06
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: I am not a robot check boxes on websites

 

Paul,

          I would not presume that MS-Edge is accessible in its entirety via JAWS until VFO states that it is and under what releases.

          It was just a fluke this morning that I brought up the confirmation page in Edge since I had it up for something else as well. I fired up JAWS because it had been mentioned. For my blind and visually impaired clients I use IE, Firefox, and Chrome alone or in combination as the client prefers.  Edge is still too much of a work in progress at the moment from my perspective.

--
Brian


A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices.

         ~ William James


Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

Alan Robbins <alan1057@...>
 

Dennis,

As nice as the new voices are, each time new ones appear I give a listen but after using eloquence for so many years, hard to give it up

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of dennis
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:18 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

they still seam to pronounce things the same and sound pritty much the
same to me. this is why i use elliquence. i have shelly sounding as
human as possible.


On 10/31/2016 4:55 PM, Soronel Haetir wrote:
I still prefer RSD Emily, but that has significant problems under jaws
18, particularly involving left quote (U+201c), right quote (U+201d)
and apostrophe (U+2019 IIRC) characters.

On 10/31/16, Kramlinger, Keith G., M.D. <kramlinger.keith@mayo.edu> wrote:
Hi,

I know there's a lot of subjectivity in voice preferences, but I'm curious
if any can describe general aspects of how the new Vocalizer voices are
different from the ones previously available.

Thanks in advance, Keith


Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

dennis
 

they still seam to pronounce things the same and sound pritty much the same to me. this is why i use elliquence. i have shelly sounding as human as possible.

On 10/31/2016 4:55 PM, Soronel Haetir wrote:
I still prefer RSD Emily, but that has significant problems under jaws
18, particularly involving left quote (U+201c), right quote (U+201d)
and apostrophe (U+2019 IIRC) characters.

On 10/31/16, Kramlinger, Keith G., M.D. <kramlinger.keith@mayo.edu> wrote:
Hi,

I know there's a lot of subjectivity in voice preferences, but I'm curious
if any can describe general aspects of how the new Vocalizer voices are
different from the ones previously available.

Thanks in advance, Keith


Re: I am not a robot check boxes on websites

 

Paul,

          I would not presume that MS-Edge is accessible in its entirety via JAWS until VFO states that it is and under what releases.

          It was just a fluke this morning that I brought up the confirmation page in Edge since I had it up for something else as well. I fired up JAWS because it had been mentioned. For my blind and visually impaired clients I use IE, Firefox, and Chrome alone or in combination as the client prefers.  Edge is still too much of a work in progress at the moment from my perspective.

--
Brian


A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices.

         ~ William James


Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

Soronel Haetir
 

I still prefer RSD Emily, but that has significant problems under jaws
18, particularly involving left quote (U+201c), right quote (U+201d)
and apostrophe (U+2019 IIRC) characters.

On 10/31/16, Kramlinger, Keith G., M.D. <kramlinger.keith@mayo.edu> wrote:
Hi,

I know there's a lot of subjectivity in voice preferences, but I'm curious
if any can describe general aspects of how the new Vocalizer voices are
different from the ones previously available.

Thanks in advance, Keith
--
Soronel Haetir
soronel.haetir@gmail.com


Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

Kramlinger, Keith G., M.D.
 

Hi,

 

I know there’s a lot of subjectivity in voice preferences, but I’m curious if any can describe general aspects of how the new Vocalizer voices are different from the ones previously available.

 

Thanks in advance, Keith


Re: V 18 disapointment

Aidan <aidan.smarttalk@...>
 

I will upgrade cause I need the new vocalizer voices.

On 31/10/2016, Carolyn Arnold <4carolyna@windstream.net> wrote:
Like a lot of new medications that come out - actually, they're me toos.

Bye for now,

Carolyn


-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Kimber
Gardner
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 1:13 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: V 18 disapointment

Same here, though it feels like something of a racket given the poor quality
of some releases that seem like no more than bug fixes dressed up as new
versions.

On 10/31/16, Marianne Denning <marianne@denningweb.com> wrote:
The problem is that if you don’t upgrade and keep purchasing the SMA
for your JAWS you will pay an outrageous price to upgrade in the
future. I have always purchased the SMAs and kept my JAWS current. I
will probably wait for
1 release to come out before I upgrade but I will definitely upgrade.



From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of
stintonjoe@btinternet.com
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 12:54 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: V 18 disapointment



well i have only just brought jaws 17, so i wont be upgrading !!!





From: Drew Hunthausen <mailto:dhunthausen@gmail.com>

Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 3:23 PM

To: main@jfw.groups.io <mailto:main@jfw.groups.io>

Subject: V 18 disapointment



I just got the official e-mail announcing Jaws 18. Disappointed!
Doesn’t sound like there is anything improved or new that I will use.
Won’t upgrade anytime soon!




--
Kimberly







--
Facebook: m.facebook.com/aidan.maher92
Skype: andries4451
Twitter: smarttalk7
Audioboo: www.audioboo.com/DjSpotlight


Re: I am not a robot check boxes on websites

paul lemm
 

Hi Brian,

 

You said you were using MS edge, is this now accessible with Jaws? I’m using Jaws 16 and it still doesn’t seem to work here.

 

Paul

 

 

 

From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Brian Vogel
Sent: 31 October 2016 14:04
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: I am not a robot check boxes on websites

 

Oops, missed the comment about the confirmation page.  I, however, am not having any problem with it in MS-Edge with JAWS 17.  It reads the "I am not a robot" checkbox unchecked and I can check/uncheck that checkbox with spacebar.
--
Brian


A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices.

         ~ William James


Re: V 18 disappointment

Alan Robbins <alan1057@...>
 

I have played with the audio ducking a bit, but what I don't
like is it makes hearing any system sound, i.e. dialogue
boxes that pop up, email download sounds, etc. difficult to
hear if JAWS is talking.

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Carolyn Arnold
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 2:31 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: V 18 disapointment

I'm with you, Maria.

Bye for now,

Carolyn


-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On
Behalf Of Maria Campbell
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 1:12 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: V 18 disapointment

I appreciate the migration feature and the audio ducking,
which isn't an awful lot to like, but I have also purchased
the SMA for the same reason stated here. Besides, unlike
some of the young people here, I'm just too old to learn new
tricks, so I'll probably die a JAWS user.





Maria Campbell
lucky1@gmail.com <mailto:lucky1@gmail.com>

Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries.
Without them, humanity cannot survive.
--Dalai Lama
On 10/31/2016 1:05 PM, Marianne Denning wrote:


The problem is that if you don't upgrade and keep
purchasing the SMA for your JAWS you will pay an outrageous
price to upgrade in the future. I have always purchased the
SMAs and kept my JAWS current. I will probably wait for 1
release to come out before I upgrade but I will definitely
upgrade.



From: main@jfw.groups.io <mailto:main@jfw.groups.io>
[mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of
stintonjoe@btinternet.com <mailto:stintonjoe@btinternet.com>

Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 12:54 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io <mailto:main@jfw.groups.io>
Subject: Re: V 18 disapointment



well i have only just brought jaws 17, so i wont be
upgrading !!!





From: Drew Hunthausen <mailto:dhunthausen@gmail.com>


Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 3:23 PM

To: main@jfw.groups.io <mailto:main@jfw.groups.io>

Subject: V 18 disapointment



I just got the official e-mail announcing Jaws 18.
Disappointed! Doesn't sound like there is anything improved
or new that I will use. Won't upgrade anytime soon!


Re: V 18 disapointment

Carolyn Arnold <4carolyna@...>
 

Like a lot of new medications that come out - actually, they're me toos.

Bye for now,

Carolyn

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Kimber Gardner
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 1:13 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: V 18 disapointment

Same here, though it feels like something of a racket given the poor quality of some releases that seem like no more than bug fixes dressed up as new versions.

On 10/31/16, Marianne Denning <marianne@denningweb.com> wrote:
The problem is that if you don’t upgrade and keep purchasing the SMA
for your JAWS you will pay an outrageous price to upgrade in the
future. I have always purchased the SMAs and kept my JAWS current. I
will probably wait for
1 release to come out before I upgrade but I will definitely upgrade.



From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of
stintonjoe@btinternet.com
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 12:54 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: V 18 disapointment



well i have only just brought jaws 17, so i wont be upgrading !!!





From: Drew Hunthausen <mailto:dhunthausen@gmail.com>

Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 3:23 PM

To: main@jfw.groups.io <mailto:main@jfw.groups.io>

Subject: V 18 disapointment



I just got the official e-mail announcing Jaws 18. Disappointed!
Doesn’t sound like there is anything improved or new that I will use.
Won’t upgrade anytime soon!




--
Kimberly