I have both available on K1000, FineReader is fine as long as you want all your text de-columnized, that is a feature that can't be turned off, apparently, and it makes a complete hash of certain things. Both engines are fairly close in recognition, if you can adjust settings and work with them. This is much more possible in a real ocr program like Openbook or K1000.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 7/5/2022 14:37, Gene Warner wrote:
I realize that, they are paying Nuance for Omni Page, just quit paying Nuance and start paying ABBY for Fine Reader.
On 7/5/2022 3:34 PM, Bill White wrote:
Hi, Gene. They may not be licenced to use ABBY Fine Reader for both, and may need to pay to have both licences.
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Gene Warner
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2022 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: Microsoft default OCR engine with JAWS convenient OCR
I wish they'd just use the ABBY Fine Reader engine for JAWS as well as
On 7/5/2022 3:28 PM, Bill White wrote:
Hi, Chris. The fact that Vispero gives us a choice between omnipage and
the Microsoft OCR engine shows that at least at times, the Microsoft OCR
engine may give better results. If this were not the case, Vispero would
have no reason to include both OCR engines.
*From:*email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] *On Behalf Of
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 5, 2022 10:57 AM
*Subject:* Re: Microsoft default OCR engine with JAWS convenient OCR
Jaws is using omnipage, likely a lot better than anything MS includes
On 7/5/2022 12:07, Loy wrote:
There is an option in JAWS to use Microsoft's default OCR engine
with JAWS convenient OCR. Is it a better OCR engine than the one
that comes with JAWS?