Moderated Re: Microsoft default OCR engine with JAWS convenient OCR


JM Casey
 

Well, the actual editor inside doesn't work as well as I'd like for screen-readers as far as I can see so far. I think it'd be possible to scan stuff and then convert to your file format of choice and proofread from there. Like I said, I have an old scanner here but it's not set up to work with my Windows 10 computer and so I mostly just use it to OCR digitally archived stuff, for which it works great. It was sort of a snap decision to finally get the thing but I was tired of not having a workable solution to my oCR problem since I can no longer use Adobe Acrobat Pro, so I just decided to go for it.
If you set it up this way it will add an item to yoru contexxt menu shell to oCR any pdf file, and will do a nice job of it. There are all sorts of formatting and language options, too.
So while I think ther'es room for improvement, I still think it was worth getting the programme.

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io <main@jfw.groups.io> On Behalf Of Gene Warner
Sent: July 5, 2022 04:11 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Microsoft default OCR engine with JAWS convenient OCR

Hi Casey!

I've often thought about getting ABBY myself, but always hesitated because I didn't know how accessible it would be. How do you find it for accessibility?

Thanks!
Gene...


On 7/5/2022 3:47 PM, JM Casey wrote:
I bought Abbyy; seemed worth it to me as I have to deal with a lot of obscure texts for my podcast that haven't yet been properly digitised. Don't have a workign scanner at the moment but can render any pdf including ones saved from images to be quite readable.


-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io <main@jfw.groups.io> On Behalf Of Gene Warner
Sent: July 5, 2022 03:32 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Microsoft default OCR engine with JAWS convenient OCR

I wish they'd just use the ABBY Fine Reader engine for JAWS as well as Open Book.

Gene...


On 7/5/2022 3:28 PM, Bill White wrote:
Hi, Chris. The fact that Vispero gives us a choice between omnipage
and the Microsoft OCR engine shows that at least at times, the
Microsoft OCR engine may give better results. If this were not the
case, Vispero would have no reason to include both OCR engines.

Bill White

billwhite92701@... <mailto:billwhite92701@...>

*From:*main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] *On Behalf Of
*Chris Hill
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 5, 2022 10:57 AM
*To:* main@jfw.groups.io
*Subject:* Re: Microsoft default OCR engine with JAWS convenient OCR

Jaws is using omnipage, likely a lot better than anything MS includes
for free.


On 7/5/2022 12:07, Loy wrote:

There is an option in JAWS to use Microsoft's default OCR engine
with JAWS convenient OCR. Is it a better OCR engine than the one
that comes with JAWS?









Join {main@jfw.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.