I have seen this, try doing a lot of things with linode.com, they say
they have tested with nvda, but Jaws does not like the site at all.
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:23:20 -0400,
Cynthia Bruce wrote:
[1 <text/plain; utf-8 (quoted-printable)>]
I think what I’m finding is all of the ways I can navigate quickly are not always available when they don’t test with jaws.
On Oct 27, 2020, at 5:58 PM, David Goldfield <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
This is a fair question. While there are occasionally some differences in the way that JAWS and NVDA conveys information about what's on a Web page it's reasonably safe to say that pages which pass a manual audit with NVDA would likely do so with JAWS. If anything, if they only tested with JAWS and not NVDA I'd actually be a bit more concerned due to the fact that JAWS has a tendency to guess what should be read with forms that may not properly conform to current standards. This is actually great for the user but can give false positives to the one doing the testing. As long as their code is properly written and marked up you should be OK.
Blindness Assistive Technology Specialist
On 10/27/2020 4:49 PM, Cynthia Bruce wrote:
In my current university context, I am teaching a course developed by a company that is external to the university. I keep running into things that are not easily accessible, and they have told me they are only testing accessibility with NVDA. So, my question, is it likely that I will find incompatibility with JAWS when they only test with NVDA?
Thanks for any info – I want to be able to give them some feedback.
[2 <text/html; utf-8 (quoted-printable)>]
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
you spend it?
John Covici wb2una