Re: Simple Economics 101 Was: Cracked
Cy Selfridge
If memory serves me correctly Freedom Scientific was purchased by a French
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
company several years ago. Sadly FS lost most of the traits which made the several companies which formed the original basis when FS was created. Arkinstone (or however one spelled it) was a great company to deal with and they actually cared about their customers *after* the sale. Cy
-----Original Message-----
From: jfw-bounces@... [mailto:jfw-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Adrian Spratt Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2012 12:15 PM To: 'The Jaws for Windows support list.' Subject: RE: Simple Economics 101 Was: Cracked Freedom scientific is a company that emerged from the combination of three existing access technology companies at the beginning of the last decade. Richard Chandler reportedly came up with the idea as pricing power became more problematical for his previous company, Sunrise Medical. A starting point for anyone interested is a 2001 Accessworld article at http://www.afb.org/afbpress/pub.asp?DocID=aw020102in Even in a capitalist system, industries are treated differently from others if they are deemed essential to a functioning community. Electric, gas and water utilities are subject to varying degrees of regulation. Capitalism promotes initiative, and disabled people have benefited from so many accessibility initiatives, among them screenreaders. But people like Juan and Wogg, who seem to be saying that JAWS has the attributes of a utility in the lives of disabled people, do raise valid concerns. -----Original Message----- From: jfw-bounces@... [mailto:jfw-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Farfar and His Beamer Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2012 1:16 PM To: The Jaws for Windows support list. Subject: Re: Simple Economics 101 Was: Cracked Ed, Nice. Without your experience I could not have come even close to stating it so eloquently. Dave Carlson Sent from somewhere in the Western United States, using a Dell Latitude E6520 and Windows 7 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marquette, Ed" <Ed.Marquette@...> To: "The Jaws for Windows support list." <jfw@...> Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2012 10:04 Subject: RE: Simple Economics 101 Was: Cracked Although it may be a little further down the course selection than 101, it is an accepted principle of economics that a firm which can discriminate in price will make more money than one which cannot. Those who can pay more are charged more. Those who otherwise couldn't pay the high price, pay less. So, the firm makes more money on those who can pay and makes incremental revenue on those who otherwise wouldn't buy. I could demonstrate this geometrically, but that's a little beyond the purpose of this list. The above principle would suggest that Freedom Scientific would be smart to discriminate in price. There are, however, certain so-called externalities and assumptions that tend to undermine the price discrimination strategy for profit maximization. First, for price discrimination to work, there can be no possibility for arbitrage, e.g., ability for the buyers in the low-price jurisdiction to sell into the high price jurisdiction in competition with the firm. Second, this assumes equal background regimes. The discussion on this very list points out the problem. It is generally believed, rightly or wrongly, that regard for copyright rules and laws is less in third world countries than is the case here. So, firms often believe that for every one legitimate copy of a product sold into a third world country, ten illegal copies will be made. So, the price is adjusted accordingly. The effect of the piracy is to increase the price ten times (over simplified). I'm not making this up. I'm a tech lawyer, and I've heard all the above actually articulated. So, unfortunately, that's the way it is. As much as you would like to help the puppy by extracting the thorn from its paw, it is still likely to bite your hand while you are in the process. -----Original Message----- From: jfw-bounces@... [mailto:jfw-bounces@...] On Behalf Of wogg le4 Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2012 11:42 AM To: The Jaws for Windows support list. Subject: Re: Simple Economics 101 Was: Cracked So you're really saying that you would rather starve than steal food? You're "simple economics" is a little over simplified. What it doesn't take account of is the opportunity cost. There are many people, in the world (perhaps not in the US) who can't afford to buy this. Not people who won't pay, people who genuinely can't pay. Now, JAWS developers make nothing from those people. Why? Well because they can't pay. However, the current pricing structure means that those people don't have access to a computer, in real terms. Computing may or may not be a human right for the general community. I say that computer access very definitely is a human right for the blind. Without it, our interactions with the outside world are severely restricted. Why won't FS offer reduced price versions of the programme in say the 3rd world? Their failure to do so make's the lives of milions of blind people poorer. On 2/4/12, cecropia64 <cecropia64@...> wrote: good point. i still don't like some of this stuff, but i certainly do get it. On 2/4/2012 12:12 PM, Farfar and His Beamer wrote: Richard, I like your style. To amplify what I believe cecropia64 was saying: The price charged for a product is based on what it cost to develop, what it costs to duplicate, what it costs to support, what the employees earn in salary, what it costs to rent the building, what the next version will need for development, etc.; all divided by the number of copies to be sold. A rather large amount of investment for a fairly small (in Windows or Apple terms) user community. We are after all a niche community of users so a large cost borne by a small group = high cost per copy. Simple economics. Dave Carlson Sent from somewhere in the Western United States, using a Dell Latitude E6520 and Windows 7 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Holloway"<rholloway@...> To: "The Jaws for Windows support list."<jfw@...> Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2012 08:40 Subject: [Bulk] Re: Crack For Jaws 64 Bit Win 7 I feel a perfect fool-- We paid full price, out of pocket. We had no alternative source of funding, and we wanted JAWS available for our young daughter to grow up with and learn about. Silly me, it never crossed my mind to just steal a copy. I have the same problem when shopping for food or clothes, I keep actually paying for them as opposed to choosing the route of theft, which would clearly be much more practical for my family financially. Maybe if you feel the need to steal software, posting that you support (and do) such things is not the most prudent idea? What seems really foolish to me about all of this is that you can use a demo copy of the program easily and legally for as long as you like (to my understanding) with free upgrades and all, but apparently the frequent restarting of the computer is too inconvenient for you, so you therefore need to steal the product and brag about it? Oh, and if someone gets JAWS bought with appropriate funding, the product is still being paid for. The issue is that the company and PEOPLE who develop and support the product also have to get paid for their efforts. At a certain point, be it Freedom Scientific or Microsoft, if enough people are stealing their products they'll just stop developing and supporting them. I'm funny about things myself, just like these companies-- if I don't get paid for my work I run out of money and I go out of business. On Feb 4, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Juan Pablo wrote: Really guys, How many of you paied the full price of jaws? -----Original Message----- From: cecropia64 Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2012 12:53 PM To: The Jaws for Windows support list. Subject: Re: Crack For Jaws 64 Bit Win 7 yes, i agreefully. besides, this is why prices of this stuff is so out of reach for many. because of slimy people like this guy who wants short cuts instead of doing things the correct way. thanks pal to all of you who try similar things it's really apppreciated by those of us who try to do things the honest way! On 2/4/2012 8:52 AM, George B wrote: this is not the place for this kind of thing -----Original Message----- From: jfw-bounces@... [mailto:jfw-bounces@... jdh.com] On Behalf Of wogg le4 Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 14:49 To: The Jaws for Windows support list. Subject: Crack For Jaws 64 Bit Win 7 Hi all, can anyone tell me of a working crack for win 7 64 bit? email me off list!!! _______________________________________________ Jfw mailing list Jfw@... http://lists.the-jdh.com/mailman/listinfo/jfw_lists.the-jdh.com
|
|