toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The alt attribute, when done correctly, does not show the text to sighted individuals, only screen readers.
<img src="eagle.jpg" align="middle" alt="an eagle flying over a gorge" width="200" height="200"> <ins class="HIGHLIGHT">The only limits are those of vision.</ins>
The above example is taken from my web site. The image alt text says “an eagle flying over a gorge.” Which is a simple description of the picture of an eagle.
The text, an eagle flying over a gorge is not visible to anyone sighted.
The text, The only limits are those of vision.” is visible as I intended it to be and is not part of the alt tag.
From: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Behalf Of Jaffar Sidek
Sent: Friday, May 3, 2019 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: Graphics and pictures on a web site
The Alt attribute still shows up the text on screen. What I am saying is that you could hide the text of the alt attribute from sighted users with CSS and still expose it to screen readers. Cheers!
On 5/3/2019 8:41 AM, Richard Turner wrote:
Yes, CSS is great for setting up default fonts, margins, and more.
But, for alternative text on graphics, you can just use ält="" and put the text between the quotes within the image code.
Check out my web site at: www.turner42.com
“The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy has this to say on the subject of flying. There is an art, it says, or rather, a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw
yourself at the ground and miss." --Douglas Adams, from Life, The Universe and Everything, p.59
The most common way people give up their power is by thinking they don't have any." -- Alice Walker
Hi. You might even consider the use of CSS or Cascading Style sheets. These are documents that will allow you to determine the layout and look of your page, and you could do amazing things with them: like hiding text from the sighted viewer, yet exposing
those texts to screen readers. Many web pages take this approach when implementing the "Skip to navigation" or "Skip to content" links. This wold mean that while your web page is well described for your blind visitors, all those info considered unnecessary
to the sighted would be hidden from them. So they would see your images, while those images would have descriptions tagged and read out to the low vision or the blind without any apparent unnecessary clutter. Contact me off list if you are interested to
take this approach. Cheers!
On 5/3/2019 6:52 AM, David & his pack of dogs wrote:
Kevin, My business “The Diamond Touch Dog Rehabilitation Centre” is training problem dogs. My logo is a picture of my former guide dog. On my website
thediamondtouchdog.ca I have my grad picture with him in it and a brief text for the screen reader users to describe the picture. For me, nothing more annoying then when the screen reader just reads out graphic or link. The screen reader users have no
idea what the graphic is. I believe in 022 all websites in Canada must by law be accessible for the blind. The text is imbedded. So both groups, the sighted and screen reader users are happy.
Kevin, It kind of depends on whether the graphic is for esthetics or to pretty up the page, or if it is supposed to represent a button or link. A very brief description of the
pictural would be nice in stead of just hearing, “Graphic.” All buttons or links that are used to perform a vital function on the page must be labeled.
Another problem that I have noticed lately with control elements on web pages are combo boxes that do not say whatis in them when you hit Enter to open them. I hear JAWS make the
sound when forms mode is open, but when I press the down arrow, all I hear is krikets, not even “Blank.” I found this recently on a page where I needed to fill in my address. The State is usually handled with a combo box and you can enter the combo box and
hit the first letter of your state and hear those states read, but this site did not work that way.
I am using Firefox, JAWS 18 on a Windows 7 machine. By the way, I am only running with 3 gigs of ram and have not experienced any of the hangs and sluggishness that all of those
on here with the latest of everything seem to be reporting. I don’t upgrade anything until it just will not work anymore or MS stops supporting.
Love in Christ
For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places.
Therefore, take up the full armor of God, so that you will be able to resist in the evil day, and having done everything, to stand firm.
Ephesians 6:12, 13
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2019 9:18 AM
Subject: Graphics and pictures on a web site
Hello, I’m taking a web development class. The final project is to create a detailed web site. AS a blind user I want to make this site as user friendly to screen readers. I have
some scenarios below. Please provide me with feedback on what works for you.
Link has a graphic and there is no text. Would you prefer just the link, text and graphic? Or it doesn’t say there is a graphic and does say link and then text telling you the use
of the link.
There is a picture used for decorative purposes. The screen reader recognizes the picture and says graphic. Sometimes there will be text and other times no text. Would you prefer
the screen reader saying graphic and then the text explaining the picture? Or just the graphic? Or nothing at all?
When the graphics do have text do you like it to be very detailed? Or is it okay to just say something like “more information”? I say “more information as I have seen this many
Those that use something to in large the text, what colors work best for you when viewing a web site?
If you have any other comments about problems you encounter on a web site let me know.