Re: List request
James Homuth
My guess is something’s amiss with your Outlook settings, then. Also curious why it wants to open Windows Mail if Outlook’s the default. But I’ll bet your emails aren’t actually sending, but are rather probably still sitting in your outbox.
From: main@jfw.groups.io <main@jfw.groups.io> On Behalf Of denise avant
Sent: October-29-18 7:12 PM To: main@jfw.groups.io Subject: Re: List request
Hi, I just checked my settings, and outlook is the default e-mail client. I should also say that I sent one of my previous messages from the mail account on my iPhone. I think I have sent two, but I have forgotten what one of them was about. I recall that the other had to do with possibly having JAWS work on a Surface Go.
From: main@jfw.groups.io <main@jfw.groups.io> On Behalf Of James Homuth
Hello,
It sounds like your Outlook isn’t set up properly. This message came through just fine, but the fact it wants to open it up in windows Mail tells me whoever actually set up Outlook only did part of the job. This would also explain why I never received your email.
James, List Admin
From: main@jfw.groups.io <main@jfw.groups.io> On Behalf Of denise avant
Hello, I am replying to this thread only because I have been having trouble posting directly to the list using MS Outlook, though I have joined it. So, just as a test, I have clicked on the e-mail address for the group seen in some of the posts. When I do that, I am sent to Windows Mail, not Outlook, which is my mail client. I can read the mail from the group in Outlook. So, I am wondering if it is not possible to actually send a post to this group using Outlook? I did e-mail the list moderator with no response.
From: main@jfw.groups.io <main@jfw.groups.io> On Behalf Of Sieghard Weitzel
I agree with Richard, when I read messages I delete them when I read the message and if another person replies a day later referring to something but he does not have the thread in his message I found it is often unclear what this refers to. I guess in such a case I just also delete he message since I may not be able torespond not knowing the context, but while a long thread may not be always useful it doesn’t bother me since the new reply is at the top (if it isn’t then that is not my problem) so I don’t have to read the entire thread, but if I do want to refer back to something then I can or if I look for a link that was in a message 5 replies further down the thread then it is easy to find..
From: main@jfw.groups.io <main@jfw.groups.io> On Behalf Of Shirley Tracy
I think keeping the subject line clear and specific will help a lot, even if it needs to be changed/updated to fit a new thread from the original. Just my opinion.
Cheerfully,
Shirley Tracy
From: george b
Thank you...i feel the same way how can we help if we do not know what your asking about
-----Original Message----- From: main@jfw.groups.io <main@jfw.groups.io> On Behalf Of Richard Turner Sent: October 28, 2018 8:13 To: JFW user list <main@jfw.groups.io> Subject: List request
This is my Pet Peeve for the month: Those of you, and there are several so I'm not pointing out anyone in particular, on this list who have there email set to not quote the previous message make it very difficult for those of us who want to help. If you do not explain the context of your message, it often leaves me scratching my head wondering what the heck the person is replying to. So, please consider summarizing the answer you are replying to so we might be able to offer a different suggestion, or set your email program to include the prior message. Just my thoughts. I often want to assist, but have no idea what the issue is, so I simply delete the message. Richard
"It is a great thing to start life with a small number of really good books which are your very own." __ Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
|
|