Re: WE and Jaws
Bill White <billwhite92701@...>
Yep, you're right. I had a brain fade for a moment.toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Chris G
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: WE and Jaws
The company that merged with GW Micro in 2014 was Ai Squared, not V Squared.
The V in VFO is for Vector.
Where the magic is in learning.
Ready to begin using your assistive technology with confidence while
actually having fun? Visit us to learn about our comprehensive audio
tutorials, one-on-one support and ongoing teleclasses. We also offer
eclectic and timely assistive technology podcasts, a newsletter
containing exclusive news and discounts, regularly updated free
downloads, and so much more.
Phone: (716) 543-3323 (Ext. 500)
-------- Original Message --------
From: Bill White
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 7:20 PM EST
Subject: WE and Jaws
Yes, The V in VFO is for V Squared, which first bought Window-Eyes from GW
Micro. Then Freedom Scientific merged with Optelec and VSquared. So Freedom
Scientific now has the ownership of Window-Eyes which is going to be fazed
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Mike
Elledge via Groups.Io
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: WE and Jaws
Stupid question: has FS acquired WE? I didn't find anything on line.
On May 26, 2017, at 7:11 PM, Marquette, Ed <email@example.com>
I certainly hope so. WE always handled remote access, particularly
Citrix, better than did Jaws. In fact Jaws still will not work with Citrix
when it is running in a virtual environment.
Also, the pronounciation dictionaries were far more robust in WE. For
instance, for those of us who sometimes dictate using Dragon Naturally
Speaking, the wE dictionaries worked great for distinguishing homonyms .
Sent from my iPhone
On May 26, 2017, at 5:28 PM, Don H <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Wondering if there is any chance in heck that FS will take a hard look at
what Window Eyes might have been doing better than Jaws and incorporate some
of those things into Jaws? I fully understand that WE did some things
better than Jaws and Jaws does some thing better than WE but maybe a little
mingling of the two would end up with a overall better screen reader.
This E-mail message is confidential, is intended only for the named
recipients above and may contain information
that is privileged, attorney work product or otherwise protected by
applicable law. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender at 402-346-6000 and delete this