Re: The answer is not to tell us that buying a new version of JAWS is the proper solution.
Lisle, Ted (CHFS DMS)
When we first started teaching Windows to talk here at the cabinet, DFB in Kentucky was promoting JAWS. At that time, it was basic transportation, but stable, and that was 20 years ago. I’d like to explore NVDA in some depth, but may not find the time in the immediate future.
Re: tech support, overall it has been really strong, but I have noticed a slight tendency toward condescension in some newer personnel. I’ll bet a nickel I’ve been using PC’s longer than the last twit to whom I spoke, but there’s one in every crowd.
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Brian Vogel
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: The answer is not to tell us that buying a new version of JAWS is the proper solution.
Just for a tiny bit of perspective from someone who was once "on the other side" as a software developer it is unrealistic to expect any software maker to support a given version of something "in perpetuity." Now, mind you, that's not
to say that say, three or four of the most recent versions of a piece of software such as JAWS should not be simultaneously maintained, as I believe they should. As many have pointed out, they're not seeking the new "bells and whistles" that are perpetually
being added not only to JAWS, but to almost any piece of software you can name that's under active maintenance. Freedom Scientific (now VFO) has historically been using "upgrade to the new version" as their fix for everything for as long as I've been tutoring
JAWS. What's worse, and I've experienced it more than once, is that there have been instances where the new version breaks existing functionality in specific circumstances and how that escaped testing is beyond me.
Many are under the gross misapprehension that the Constitution is a cage and a laundry-list rather than a framework upon which great things have been and still will be built. Many things that are entirely Constitutional are not "in the Constitution," but are allowed under it.