-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Lisle, Ted
(CHFS DMS)
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 8:16 AM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

The difference between the two is just 4 units--65 to 69. Within the
male-female parameters, most can be made to sound virtually identical by
adjusting the pitch. The one exception is Bobby; that little twit needs to
be slapped upside the head, then left alone. Who in the name of reason
would want to listen to that all day!

Ted

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Carolyn
Arnold
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 9:24 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

I finally found them. Probably I'll go back to Reid, but I'm trying Glenn. I
keep mine set pretty fast, so the higher pitched ones sounded like they'd be
harder to understand.
Thanks for getting me there.

Bye for now,

Carolyn


-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Maria
Campbell
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 8:38 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

Insert J, then to voice adjustment.


Maria Campbell
lucky1@...

Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries.
Without them, humanity cannot survive.
--Dalai Lama

On 10/31/2016 8:18 PM, Carolyn Arnold wrote:

I tried that and got to the same place I have gotten in

other places.

I am trying to get to the choices of like Reid and

Samantha, thanks.

Bye for now,

Carolyn

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On

Behalf Of Alan

Robbins
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 8:12 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer

voices

Carolyn

Ctrl + jaws key + s

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On

Behalf Of

Carolyn Arnold
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 7:36 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer

voices

Maria, which command to you give to get to the voice

choices? I've

done it in the past, but can't remember where it is and

not getting

there tonight, thanks.

Bye for now,

Carolyn

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On

Behalf Of

Maria Campbell
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 7:18 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer

voices

Eloquence rocks! There's nothing better.


Maria Campbell
lucky1@...

Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries.
Without them, humanity cannot survive.
--Dalai Lama

On 10/31/2016 7:16 PM, Carolyn Arnold wrote:

I vote for Eloquence.

Bye for now,

Carolyn


-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On

Behalf Of Alan

Robbins
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:55 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer

voices

Dennis,

As nice as the new voices are, each time new ones appear

I

give a

listen but after using eloquence for so many years, hard

to give it up

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On

Behalf Of

dennis
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:18 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer

voices

they still seam to pronounce things the same and sound

pritty much the same to me. this is why i use elliquence.

i have

shelly sounding as human as possible.

On 10/31/2016 4:55 PM, Soronel Haetir wrote:

I still prefer RSD Emily, but that has significant

problems under

jaws 18, particularly involving left quote (U+201c),

right quote

(U+201d) and apostrophe (U+2019 IIRC) characters.

On 10/31/16, Kramlinger, Keith G., M.D.

<kramlinger.keith@...> wrote:

Hi,

I know there's a lot of subjectivity in voice

preferences, but I'm

curious if any can describe general aspects of how the

new Vocalizer

voices are different from the ones previously

available.

Thanks in advance, Keith