Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices


Lisle, Ted (CHFS DMS)
 

I agree. Each time we're told the new voices are the hottest thing since instant coffee, but there's always a let-down. I've never claimed eloquence sounds human, the female voices verge on awful, baring just a trace of Marge Simpson. Having said that, I can rip along at good speed, and seldom need a repeat, and that's good.

Ted

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Alan Robbins
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:55 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

Dennis,

As nice as the new voices are, each time new ones appear I give a listen but after using eloquence for so many years, hard to give it up

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of dennis
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 6:18 PM
To: main@jfw.groups.io
Subject: Re: Old vocalizer voices versus new vocalizer voices

they still seam to pronounce things the same and sound pritty much the same to me. this is why i use elliquence. i have shelly sounding as human as possible.


On 10/31/2016 4:55 PM, Soronel Haetir wrote:
I still prefer RSD Emily, but that has significant problems under jaws
18, particularly involving left quote (U+201c), right quote (U+201d)
and apostrophe (U+2019 IIRC) characters.

On 10/31/16, Kramlinger, Keith G., M.D. <kramlinger.keith@mayo.edu> wrote:
Hi,

I know there's a lot of subjectivity in voice preferences, but I'm
curious if any can describe general aspects of how the new Vocalizer
voices are different from the ones previously available.

Thanks in advance, Keith

Join main@jfw.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.