Re: A different way to review track changes
Cynthia Bruce
No worries, I have managed to work through it, but I do appreciate the offer. Really everyone has had very helpful suggestions, and I will undoubtedly look into JAWS 18 as soon as my dissertation is finished. I'm not anxious to switch when I am in the midst of the final crunch.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks to all, Cynthia
-----Original Message-----
From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of George B Sent: October 26, 2016 11:24 AM To: main@jfw.groups.io Subject: Re: A different way to review track changes Cindy if you wish to send me the doc I can try with jaws 18 -----Original Message----- From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Marquette, Ed Sent: October 26, 2016 06:46 To: main@jfw.groups.io Subject: Re: A different way to review track changes That's the word from Escalation at Freedom Scientific or whatever it is called now. I plan to give JAWS 18 a try when I have some free time. -----Original Message----- From: main@jfw.groups.io [mailto:main@jfw.groups.io] On Behalf Of Kimber Gardner Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 8:29 AM To: main@jfw.groups.io Subject: Re: A different way to review track changes Hmm, I haven't investigated jaws 18 as yet, but if the track changes problem is really fixed it would make it worth the price of admission. On 10/26/16, Marquette, Ed <ed.marquette@...> wrote: On particularly large and complex documents, windows + shift + r and -- Kimberly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This E-mail message is confidential, is intended only for the named recipients above and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or otherwise protected by applicable law. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender at 402-346-6000 and delete this E-mail message. Thank you. |
|