Re: Keeping Up With Technology
Andre Jarreau <andre.jarreau@...>
Well said. Dollars Make Sense. Nothing can happen without them. Peopletoggle quoted messageShow quoted text
have to get paid.
Yes we lag behind. We must all do work arounds until the tech can catch up.
It's the nature of the beast. Greatfully no matter how difficult, at least
there is a beast to work with.
From: Jfw [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Brad Martin
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 8:34 PM
To: The Jaws for Windows support list.
Cc: Brad Martin
Subject: Re: Keeping Up With Technology
I can't really fault Freedom Scientific for this. Designers do crazier
and crazier things with software and websites every day, and the people
at FS aren't psychic. It's been this way since before I got into
computers I'm sure, and that was 1992. You can't redesign software to
fix a problem until the problem exists. So what happens. A new version
of Windows comes out, and then JAWS has to be rewritten to handle the
new stuff. A new version of Office comes out replacing menus with
ribbons, and again, the software has to be rewritten to deal with the
new layout. Netflix changes their website, and again something has to be
tweaked to handle the new wrinkle. If the site designer would use Alt
tags on their graphics, graphical links wouldn't be an issue.
The other side of that coin is that you have to do your part, and that
means updating to the latest version of JAWS if you want the latest
fixes to the latest problems. I don't generally update to every new
release, because for what I do, I can usually skip five or so versions.
It's cheaper that way, and I don't feel like I'm missing out. If you're
more on the cutting edge of technology, you may have to update more
Which brings me to my final point of the night. People gripe about the
cost of assistive technology, but as rapidly as things change,
programmers are always having to work writing code to accommodate those
new features and problems. And unlike, say, Microsoft Office, which
people use by the millions and millions of copies, assistive technology
has an extremely small market share. People want the very latest and
greatest, and they want the software authors to work for free.
Is what we have perfect? No. But if you were using JAWS back in the days
of Internet Explorer 3.0, you remember when the only way to read a news
article was with the JAWS cursor (there was no virtual cursor), and you
had to read three or four columns of articles at one time with all the
stories mixed together. We've come soooooo far since 1997 when I started
teaching people how to use the Internet. When you step back eighteen
years, it's really quite amazing how rapidly our technology catches up
with the rest of the world compared to how long it used to take.
On 6/22/2015 6:25 PM, Kevin Wollenweber via Jfw wrote:
You know, with all the hardships that I read within this EList, especiallythat
change configurations as often as they change their underwear, but alsowith
Freedom Scientific for not keeping the programs compatible and currentwith
a lot of new programs and changing graphics. If screenreaders were ableto
recognize changing graphics, I think things would be a lot moreaccessible.
No one saw this Netflix change coming; I mean, the site is definitelymore
is made of graphics, well, then I guess that, right now, they'll lose alot
of subscribers who can't figure out the situation, but my hope is that<http://lists.the-jdh.com/pipermail/jfw_lists.the-jdh.com/attachments/201506
My Facebook page where I post online shopping coupons and deals:
My SmarterBucks signup link <http://bit.ly/1w5FCPu>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
Jfw mailing list