The natural voices can only go so fast, and usable speed wise it's
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
quite a bit lower than eloquence, no matter how much power you throw
at it. However, I likely have the most hardware in a single box and
by the time you get to what I have they are in fact plenty responsive.
I have an 8 core Xeon running at 3ghz system with 32gb ram as my
The SAPI5 voices from Ivona can go a fair bit faster than the solo
direct (or whatever other interface nuance chooses to slap on top of
it)but I find them less comfortable to use. Just the quirks in
enunciation. The book port plus has what I would call a
"semi-mechanical" synthesizer, and that I actually find very
comfortable to use., even with the speed increased to 4 or 5.
(That is one problem we face, every system I've seen measures speed in
different terms so it's no so easy to do a direct comparison
On 9/24/12, John Sherrer <email@example.com> wrote:
I have tried the Human like voices and found them slow and not very
responsive. But the electronic voices can go fast and are ddresponsive.
seems to me that the extra harmonics on the human sounding voices take a
lot more processing power to generate, maybe the problem will be solved
more processing power? If someone on this list using a 12 core processor
tried the human voices? I am not an expert on programming, or how the
voices are generated.
I noticed that when I downloaded the JAWS beta that they offer 64 bit
voices, has anyone tried them or do we have to wait for the official
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
On Behalf Of ptusing
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 9:37 PM
To: The Jaws for Windows support list.
Subject: Re: A Modest Proposal
I am passing along your message.
For over 2 years, I have contacted every Lighthouse and many training
asking that they ask Freedom Scientific to improve on the synthesizer
for clarity and for faster reading speeds as almost every one I believe
get to that age when hearing problems start. As several blindness
conditions can bring along hearing difficulties, I ask that the voices in
JAWS 14 survive. I will have to work into my late 70's and I fear the loss
of ability to use a screen reader and loss of productivity.
Afterall, what senses do we use to access the computer? Ifthat isn't a
how else can one usethe computer unless we get better synthesizer options?
We need improvements.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marquette, Ed" <Ed.Marquette@KutakRock.com>
To: "The Jaws for Windows support list." <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 7:22 PM
Subject: A Modest Proposal
I have unashamedly borrowed the subject of this message for the purpose of
highlighting issues that have so often been vented on this and, doubtless,
Many of us have talked about putting pressure on Freedom Scientific to
bugs and take care of known issues before introducing new features which,
it seems, introduce bugs almost randomly through the program. Alas, it
seems that there is no way effectively to get a message that means
something to Freedom Scientific.
What if we, the users, called for a feature moratorium? I'm talking
a request that Freedom Scientific introduce no new features until it has
fixed known issues.
Now, how would we bring pressure to bear on Freedom Scientific to get it
to do that?
One way is an old-fashioned petition drive. When thousands of users sign
a petition demanding action, that's hard for any company to ignore.
Now, let's raise the stakes a little. What if this petition is on the
Internet such that searches for terms like "JAWS," "Freedom Scientific,"
"screen reader," and the like would bring up a petition signed by
thousands of users demanding a stable screen reader?
OK, let's raise the stakes even higher. Let's say that those who signed
the petition felt so strongly that they were willing to put their money
where their mouth is? In other words, what if we were able to sacrifice
an SMA, in effect, saying that we would be willing, as it were, to spend
one SMA just to get a stable, reliable, dependable screen reader -- no
jazzy gimmicks that introduce bugs.
Personally, if JAWS 14 is built on the JAWS 13 platform, I have little
hope that even half the bugs introduced in JAWS 13 will be fixed. Let
alone the ones that existed before. Nevertheless, I would be willing
sign (and to start) such a petition.
There is such a petition site on the Internet. It is called Change.Org.
One of my clients found a petition signed by students protesting a
debit-card plan that a number of schools cram down students' throats.
Well, there is nothing worse than a petition signed by one. I'm putting
this idea out there for comment and refinement. Clearly, there are
details I have not thought about. Comment is invited.
I hope some self-appointed moderator does not claim this is off-topic. I
cannot think of anything more JAWS-related.
What do you think? I say, instead of just complaining, let's do
I. Edward Marquette
Direct Dial: 816.502.4646
Google Voice: 408.692.5640
Kutak Rock LLP
1010 Grand Boulevard
Kansas City, MO 64106
ANY FEDERAL TAX ADVICE CONTAINED IN THIS MESSAGE SHOULD NOT BE USED OR
REFERRED TO IN THE PROMOTING, MARKETING OR
RECOMMENDING OF ANY ENTITY, INVESTMENT PLAN OR ARRANGEMENT, AND SUCH
ADVICE IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN TO BE USED,
AND CANNOT BE USED, BY A TAXPAYER FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING PENALTIES
UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE.
This E-mail message is confidential, is intended only for the named
recipients above and may contain information
that is privileged, attorney work product or otherwise protected by
applicable law. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender at 402-346-6000 and delete
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
Jfw mailing list
Jfw mailing list
Jfw mailing list